bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next] bpf: POC on local_storage charge and uncharge map_ops
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:26:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3c422c7-b15e-32ee-4156-b9d26896f7a0@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200725013047.4006241-1-kafai@fb.com>

Thanks for this, I was able to update the series with this patch and it works.
One minor comment though.

I was wondering how should I send it as a part of the series. I will keep the
original commit description + mention this thread and add your Co-Developed-by:
tag and then you can add your Signed-off-by: as well. I am not sure of the 
canonical way here and am open to suggestions :)

- KP

On 25.07.20 03:30, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> It is a direct replacement of the patch 3 in discussion [1]
> and to test out the idea on adding
> map_local_storage_charge, map_local_storage_uncharge,
> and map_owner_storage_ptr.
> 
> It is only compiler tested to demo the idea.
> 
> [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200723115032.460770-4-kpsingh@chromium.org/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h            |  10 ++
>  include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h   |  51 +++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   8 +-

[...]

> +
> +static void sk_storage_uncharge(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
> +				void *owner, u32 size)
> +{
> +	struct sock *sk = owner;
> +
> +	atomic_sub(size, &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> +}
> +
> +static struct bpf_local_storage __rcu **
> +sk_storage_ptr(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner)

Do we need an smap pointer here? It's not being used and is also not
used for inode as well.

- KP

> +{
> +	struct sock *sk = owner;
> +
> +	return &sk->sk_bpf_storage;
> +}
> +

[...]

> -/* BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get flags */
> +/* BPF_FUNC_<local>_storage_get flags */
>  enum {
> -	BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE	= (1ULL << 0),
> +	BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE	= (1ULL << 0),
> +	/* BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE is only kept for backward compatibility
> +	 * and BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE must be used instead.
> +	 */
> +	BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE  = BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE,
>  };
>  
>  /* BPF_FUNC_read_branch_records flags. */
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-27 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23 11:50 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/7] Generalizing bpf_local_storage KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/7] bpf: Renames to prepare for generalizing sk_storage KP Singh
2020-07-24  5:31   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-24 15:44     ` KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/7] bpf: Generalize caching for sk_storage KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/7] bpf: Generalize bpf_sk_storage KP Singh
2020-07-25  1:13   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-27 20:28     ` KP Singh
2020-07-25  1:30   ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next] bpf: POC on local_storage charge and uncharge map_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-27 20:26     ` KP Singh [this message]
2020-07-27 21:43       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/7] bpf: Split bpf_local_storage to bpf_sk_storage KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/7] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/7] bpf: Allow local storage to be used from LSM programs KP Singh
2020-07-23 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/7] bpf: Add selftests for local_storage KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c3c422c7-b15e-32ee-4156-b9d26896f7a0@chromium.org \
    --to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).