bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V2 1/2] bpf: BPF-helper for MTU checking add length input
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:36:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e339303d-1d95-e8d4-565c-920eb1a3eca8@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161364899856.1250213.17435782167100828617.stgit@firesoul>

On 2/18/21 12:49 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The FIB lookup example[1] show how the IP-header field tot_len
> (iph->tot_len) is used as input to perform the MTU check.
> 
> This patch extend the BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu() with the same ability
> to provide the length as user parameter input, via mtu_len parameter.
> 
> [1] samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_kern.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   17 +++++++++++------
>   net/core/filter.c        |   12 ++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 4c24daa43bac..4ba4ef0ff63a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3850,8 +3850,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
>    *
>    * long bpf_check_mtu(void *ctx, u32 ifindex, u32 *mtu_len, s32 len_diff, u64 flags)
>    *	Description
> -
> - *		Check ctx packet size against exceeding MTU of net device (based
> + *		Check packet size against exceeding MTU of net device (based
>    *		on *ifindex*).  This helper will likely be used in combination
>    *		with helpers that adjust/change the packet size.
>    *
> @@ -3868,6 +3867,14 @@ union bpf_attr {
>    *		against the current net device.  This is practical if this isn't
>    *		used prior to redirect.
>    *
> + *		On input *mtu_len* must be a valid pointer, else verifier will
> + *		reject BPF program.  If the value *mtu_len* is initialized to
> + *		zero then the ctx packet size is use.  When value *mtu_len* is
> + *		provided as input this specify the L3 length that the MTU check
> + *		is done against. Remember XDP and TC length operate at L2, but
> + *		this value is L3 as this correlate to MTU and IP-header tot_len
> + *		values which are L3 (similar behavior as bpf_fib_lookup).
> + *
>    *		The Linux kernel route table can configure MTUs on a more
>    *		specific per route level, which is not provided by this helper.
>    *		For route level MTU checks use the **bpf_fib_lookup**\ ()
> @@ -3892,11 +3899,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
>    *
>    *		On return *mtu_len* pointer contains the MTU value of the net
>    *		device.  Remember the net device configured MTU is the L3 size,
> - *		which is returned here and XDP and TX length operate at L2.
> + *		which is returned here and XDP and TC length operate at L2.
>    *		Helper take this into account for you, but remember when using
> - *		MTU value in your BPF-code.  On input *mtu_len* must be a valid
> - *		pointer and be initialized (to zero), else verifier will reject
> - *		BPF program.
> + *		MTU value in your BPF-code.
>    *
>    *	Return
>    *		* 0 on success, and populate MTU value in *mtu_len* pointer.
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 7059cf604d94..fcc3bda85960 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -5660,7 +5660,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb,
>   	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (unlikely(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && len_diff))
> +	if (unlikely(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && (len_diff || *mtu_len)))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex);
> @@ -5670,7 +5670,11 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb,
>   	mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu);
>   
>   	dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len;
> -	skb_len = skb->len + len_diff; /* minus result pass check */
> +
> +	/* If set use *mtu_len as input, L3 as iph->tot_len (like fib_lookup) */
> +	skb_len = *mtu_len ? *mtu_len + dev->hard_header_len : skb->len;
> +
> +	skb_len += len_diff; /* minus result pass check */
>   	if (skb_len <= dev_len) {
>   		ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS;
>   		goto out;
> @@ -5715,6 +5719,10 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_xdp_check_mtu, struct xdp_buff *, xdp,
>   	/* Add L2-header as dev MTU is L3 size */
>   	dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len;
>   
> +	/* Use *mtu_len as input, L3 as iph->tot_len (like fib_lookup) */
> +	if (*mtu_len)
> +		xdp_len = *mtu_len + dev->hard_header_len;
> +
>   	xdp_len += len_diff; /* minus result pass check */
>   	if (xdp_len > dev_len)
>   		ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;
> 

Btw, one more note on the whole bpf_*_check_mtu() helper... Last week I implemented
PMTU discovery support for clients for Cilium's XDP stand-alone LB in DSR mode, so I
was briefly considering whether to use the bpf_xdp_check_mtu() helper for retrieving
the device MTU, but then I thought to myself why having an unnecessary per-packet cost
for an extra helper call if I could just pass it in via constant instead. So I went
with the latter instead of the helper with the tradeoff to restart the Cilium agent
if someone actually changes MTU in prod which is a rare event anyway.

Looking at what bpf_xdp_check_mtu() for example really offers is retrieval of dev->mtu
as well as dev->hard_header_len and the rest can all be done inside the BPF prog itself
w/o the helper overhead. Why am I mentioning this.. because the above change is a similar
case of what could have been done /inside/ the BPF prog anyway (especially on XDP where
extra overhead should be cut where possible).

I think it got lost somewhere in the many versions of the original set where it was
mentioned before, but allowing to retrieve the dev object into BPF context and then
exposing it similarly to how we handle the case of struct bpf_tcp_sock would have been
much cleaner approach, e.g. the prog from XDP and tc context would be able to do:

   struct bpf_dev *dev = ctx->dev;

And we expose initially, for example:

   struct bpf_dev {
     __u32 mtu;
     __u32 hard_header_len;
     __u32 ifindex;
     __u32 rx_queues;
     __u32 tx_queues;
   };

And we could also have a BPF helper for XDP and tc that would fetch a /different/ dev
given we're under RCU context anyway, like ...

BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_dev, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, u32, ifindex)
{
	return dev_get_by_index_rcu(dev_net(xdp->rxq->dev), index);
}

... returning a new dev_or_null type. With this flexibility everything else can be done
inside the prog, and later on it easily allows to expose more from dev side. Actually,
I'm inclined to code it up ...

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-26 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 11:49 [PATCH bpf-next V2 0/2] bpf: Updates for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-18 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 1/2] bpf: BPF-helper for MTU checking add length input Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-26 23:36   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2021-02-27 10:37     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-03-08 22:14       ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-02-18 11:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper input mtu_len param Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-19  6:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 0/2] bpf: Updates for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-26 22:34   ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-03-08 14:44     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e339303d-1d95-e8d4-565c-920eb1a3eca8@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).