From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf/helpers: introduce sleepable timers
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:59:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i2womwfk2bvxh3h7ubmj2p4aqywci36hcfufuqflcusg73ilsq@chpndguq7bgu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rhdu4st5tfabsdqs27ewhvdlwblhj2re4o56iz3fq3bsuokxxe@gtuqdjffj2hn>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:50:10AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> static bool is_rbtree_lock_required_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> return is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(btf_id);
> @@ -12140,6 +12143,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> }
> }
>
> + if (is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
> + err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
> + set_timer_callback_state);
> + if (err) {
> + verbose(env, "kfunc %s#%d failed callback verification\n",
> + func_name, meta.func_id);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
All makes sense so far.
Please squash all the fix and repost.
It's hard to do a proper review in this shape of the patch.
As far as rcu_read_lock/unlock that is done in callback...
it feels buggy and unnecessary.
bpf prog and timer won't disappear while work is queued.
array and hash map will call bpf_obj_free_timer() before going away.
And things like:
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ callback_fn = rcu_dereference(t->sleepable_cb_fn);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!callback_fn)
+ return;
is 99% broken. if (!callback_fn) line is UAF.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 17:18 [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 00/10] allow HID-BPF to do device IOs Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf/verifier: introduce in_sleepable() helper Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf/helpers: introduce sleepable timers Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-15 15:23 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-16 9:50 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-21 2:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2024-02-21 16:06 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-16 6:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-16 8:13 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-16 14:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-16 14:58 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-17 13:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-21 2:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-16 14:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-16 16:58 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 03/10] bpf/verifier: allow more maps in sleepable bpf programs Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-21 2:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 04/10] HID: bpf/dispatch: regroup kfuncs definitions Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 05/10] HID: bpf: export hid_hw_output_report as a BPF kfunc Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 06/10] selftests/hid: Add test for hid_bpf_hw_output_report Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 07/10] HID: bpf: allow to inject HID event from BPF Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 08/10] selftests/hid: add tests for hid_bpf_input_report Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 09/10] HID: bpf: allow to use bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb() in tracing callbacks Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-14 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 10/10] selftests/hid: add test for bpf_timer Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=i2womwfk2bvxh3h7ubmj2p4aqywci36hcfufuqflcusg73ilsq@chpndguq7bgu \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).