Hi Pavel,

Thank you for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> Sent: 09 March 2021 20:37
> To: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> Cc: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; Pavel Machek
> <pavel@denx.de>; Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19.y-cip 13/40] media: i2c: Add driver for Sony IMX219 sensor
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > +/* External clock frequency is 24.0M */
> > +#define IMX219_XCLK_FREQ		24000000
> 
> MHz?
> 
> > +/*Frame Length Line*/
> 
> Make this usual comment style.
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Initialisation delay between XCLR low->high and the moment when the sensor
> > + * can start capture (i.e. can leave software stanby) must be not less than:
> > + *   t4 + max(t5, t6 + <time to initialize the sensor register over I2C>)
> > + * where
> > + *   t4 is fixed, and is max 200uS,
> > + *   t5 is fixed, and is 6000uS,
> ...
> > + * 1185 to 5333 uS, and is always less than t5.
> ...
> > + * For this reason this is always safe to wait (t4 + t5) = 6200 uS, then
> 
> I believe this should be "us" or "usec".
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Mutex for serialized access:
> > +	 * Protect sensor module set pad format and start/stop streaming safely.
> > +	 */
> 
> This is not really english.
> 
> > +/* Read registers up to 2 at a time */
> > +static int imx219_read_reg(struct imx219 *imx219, u16 reg, u32 len, u32 *val)
> > +{
> 
> > +	msgs[1].buf = &data_buf[4 - len];
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs));
> > +	if (ret != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs))
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +
> > +	*val = get_unaligned_be32(data_buf);
> 
> That's really interesting piece of code. len is in bytes, but return
> value is in 32 bit values, magic with be32...
> 
> > +static int imx219_write_reg(struct imx219 *imx219, u16 reg, u32 len, u32 val)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&imx219->sd);
> > +	u8 buf[6];
> > +
> > +	if (len > 4)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	put_unaligned_be16(reg, buf);
> > +	put_unaligned_be32(val << (8 * (4 - len)), buf + 2);
> 
> Wow. When I thought above was interesting.... this is even more so.
> 
> 
> > +static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > +{
> ...
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Applying V4L2 control value only happens
> > +	 * when power is up for streaming
> > +	 */
> > +	if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(&client->dev) == 0)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Is this usual for other cameras? Will not it cause problems to
> applications doing autogain?
> 
Above check is to see if the camera is turned ON, so the application doing autogain should be fine.

> > +	switch (ctrl->id) {
> ...
> > +	case V4L2_CID_HFLIP:
> > +	case V4L2_CID_VFLIP:
> > +		ret = imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_REG_ORIENTATION, 1,
> > +				       imx219->hflip->val |
> > +				       imx219->vflip->val << 1);
> > +		break;
> 
> ctrl->val is unused in this case?
> 
Yes, for the H/V flip it depends on the format code set.

> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		dev_info(&client->dev,
> > +			 "ctrl(id:0x%x,val:0x%x) is not handled\n",
> > +			 ctrl->id, ctrl->val);
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> 
> Rate limit this as user can trigger these?
> 
Yes can be triggered.

> > +static int imx219_set_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
> > +{
> > +	struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
> > +	if (imx219->streaming == enable) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&imx219->mutex);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (enable) {
> > +		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->dev);
> > +		if (ret < 0) {
> > +			pm_runtime_put_noidle(&client->dev);
> > +			goto err_unlock;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Apply default & customized values
> > +		 * and then start streaming.
> > +		 */
> > +		ret = imx219_start_streaming(imx219);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto err_rpm_put;
> 
> Is it correct/vital that one error path uses put_noidle() and second
> uses plain put()?
> 
As per my reading https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-omap/patch/20180518173008.73291-2-tony@atomide.com/ its OK.

> > +static int __maybe_unused imx219_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +	struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (imx219->streaming) {
> > +		ret = imx219_start_streaming(imx219);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +error:
> > +	imx219_stop_streaming(imx219);
> > +	imx219->streaming = 0;
> 
> This error path will leave driver in inconsistent state. hflip/vflip
> controls will be locked and pm_runtime_put() is not executed.
> 
Good catch, this needs fixing in upstream.

> > +static int imx219_check_hwcfg(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint *ep_cfg;
> > +	struct device_node *ep;
> > +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL);
> > +	if (!ep) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "missing endpoint node\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ep_cfg = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse(of_fwnode_handle(ep));
> > +	if (IS_ERR(ep_cfg)) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "could not parse endpoint\n");
> > +		goto error_out;
> > +	}
> ...
> > +error_out:
> > +	v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_free(ep_cfg);
> 
> Is it correct to call endpoint_free on error pointer?
> 
Yes the core handles it.

> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com");
> 
> Missing ">" at end of address.
> 
Yep needs fixing as well.

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> Best regards,
> 								Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany