[cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)

[kazuhiro3.hayashi@toshiba.co.jp (kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp)]

Hello CIP Core members,

Thank you for your replies.

I need to wait for replies of Codethink, Hitachi, and Moxa,
so would like to postpone the due date to
	January 31th (Fri)
(Lunar New Year holiday until Jan 29th)

Codethink
Cybertrust (Agreed #2)
Hitachi
Moxa
Renesas (Agreed #2)
Siemens (Agreed #2)
Toshiba (Agreed #2)

Best regards,
Kazu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cip-dev [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Takehisa Katayama
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [cip-core] Package Proposal #2 (Minimum base packages in Debian)
> 
> Hi Kazu-san,
> 
> >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> 
> Renesas agree.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Takehisa Katayama.
> 
> 
> 
> On 2020/01/21 9:52, kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp wrote:
> > Hello CIP Core members,
> >
> >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> >
> > If you have not yet replied to this proposal, please send us your opinion by
> > 	January 23th (By the next IRC meeting)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Kazu
> >
> >>
> >> Hello CIP Core members,
> >>
> >> I created a simple package proposal for the packages that are installed in the "minimum base system" of Debian.
> >> These packages are installed by
> >> 	$ debootstrap --variant=minbase buster ...
> >>
> >> It consists of 58 source packages and 84 binary packages, including all run-time dependencies.
> >>
> >> The common reason to propose:
> >> "This package is included in the minimum base system of Debian (debootstrap --variant=minbase),
> >> which is essential for all Debian binary package based systems"
> >>
> >>
> >> I would like to start the "review" phase (Phase 2) of the attached package proposal.
> >> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist/blob/master/doc/pdp.md#phase-2-proposal-review
> >>
> >> Please reply with you opinion, agree or disagree.
> >> If you cannot agree to add specific packages, please show the reasons as well.
> >>
> >> Due Date: January 20th (The next TSC meeting)
> >>
> >> We have only 2-3 working days for this review, but
> >> I think it may be enough to agree or disagree the very simple reason above.
> >> (We can extend this due date if more time required for reviews, please let me know if any requests)
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Kazu
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > .
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev