From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overflow checks
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <180ac25d-d4de-41c3-3159-835e10cfc809@web.de> (raw)
I suggest to avoid a typo in the previous patch subject.
…
> +virtual context
> +virtual report
> +virtual org
+virtual context, report, org
Is such a SmPL code variant more succinct?
…
> +@as_next@
> +expression subE1 <= as.E1;
> +expression as.E1;
…
I propose to reduce the repetition of this SmPL key word.
…
> + ... when != \(E1\|E2\|subE1\|subE2\)=E3
> + when != \(E1\|E2\|subE1\|subE2\)+=E3
…
Can it make sense to express a constraint for a metavariable of
the type “assignment operator”?
> + when != \(&E1\|&E2\|&subE1\|&subE2\)
How do you think about to use the following code exclusion specification?
+ when != & \(E1 \| E2 \| subE1 \| subE2\)
…
> +msg = "WARNING: same struct_size (line %s)" % (p1[0].line)
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p2[0], msg)
I suggest once more to pass the desired message object directly as a function argument
(without using an extra Python variable).
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 12:25 Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-06-17 14:36 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: Add array_size_dup script to detect missed overflow checks Markus Elfring
2020-06-17 16:14 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=180ac25d-d4de-41c3-3159-835e10cfc809@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=efremov@linux.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).