From: Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@gmail.com>
To: Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr
Cc: michal.lkml@markovi.net, Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nicolas.palix@imag.fr,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] [PATCH V3] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:54:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818192445.24885-1-sylphrenadin@gmail.com> (raw)
By default, coccicheck utilizes all available threads to implement
parallelisation. However, when all available threads are used,
a decrease in performance is noted. The elapsed time is minimum
when at most one thread per core is used.
For example, on benchmarking the semantic patch kfree.cocci for
usb/serial using hyperfine, the outputs obtained for J=5 and J=2
are 1.32 and 1.90 times faster than those for J=10 and J=9
respectively for two separate runs. For the larger drivers/staging
directory, minimium elapsed time is obtained for J=3 which is 1.86
times faster than that for J=12. The optimal J value does not
exceed 6 in any of the test runs. The benchmarks are run on a machine
with 6 cores, with 2 threads per core, i.e, 12 hyperthreads in all.
To improve performance, modify coccicheck to use at most only
one thread per core by default.
Signed-off-by: Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@gmail.com>
---
Changes in V2:
- Change commit message as suggested by Julia Lawall
Changes in V3:
- Use J/2 as optimal value for machines with more
than 8 hyperthreads as well.
---
scripts/coccicheck | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
index e04d328210ac..a72aa6c037ff 100755
--- a/scripts/coccicheck
+++ b/scripts/coccicheck
@@ -75,8 +75,13 @@ else
OPTIONS="--dir $KBUILD_EXTMOD $COCCIINCLUDE"
fi
+ # Use only one thread per core by default if hyperthreading is enabled
+ THREADS_PER_CORE=$(lscpu | grep "Thread(s) per core: " | tr -cd [:digit:])
if [ -z "$J" ]; then
NPROC=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
+ if [ $THREADS_PER_CORE -gt 1 -a $NPROC -gt 2 ] ; then
+ NPROC=$((NPROC/2))
+ fi
else
NPROC="$J"
fi
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200818192445.24885-1-sylphrenadin@gmail.com \
--to=sylphrenadin@gmail.com \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).