From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 22:11:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60d87dff-3b4e-d77b-a4e5-e00b010d414b@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905202151140.2561@hadrien>
> On the other hand, I don't know if the one that seemed to cause a crash
> really caused a crash. It was detected by syzkaller, and it is also
> possible that git bisect ended up at the wrong place.
Do you refer to any known bug report here?
> In any case, forgetting an of_node_put will normally just waste a little
> memory, so probably stable kernels don't care.
Will it be nice to achieve better exception handling also for these
software versions over time?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201905171432571474636@zte.com.cn>
2019-05-17 8:10 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1905170912590.4014@hadrien>
2019-05-17 8:22 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <20190520093303.GA9320@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
2019-05-20 9:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 17:20 ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-20 19:53 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-20 20:11 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-05-18 14:43 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 5:08 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 5:50 ` wen.yang99
2019-06-04 6:36 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 8:55 ` wen.yang99
2019-06-04 9:08 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-04 11:28 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-05 18:23 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: Searching for “when done” in function comments Markus Elfring
2019-05-09 1:47 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put wen.yang99
2019-05-09 8:10 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60d87dff-3b4e-d77b-a4e5-e00b010d414b@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).