From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE5FCA9EAF for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774DD21726 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 17:18:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 774DD21726 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9RHI2h5028850; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:18:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1D577B4; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:18:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79E877AE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:18:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9RHHxwG023514 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:17:59 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,236,1569276000"; d="scan'208";a="408638250" Received: from ppp-seco11pareq2-46-193-149-47.wb.wifirst.net (HELO hadrien) ([46.193.149.47]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2019 18:17:59 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:17:59 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: julia@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <7c0c65f0-8a6f-a95c-f88b-b826837f4b41@web.de> Message-ID: References: <258d568b-2783-9f13-d84d-37a84150432b@web.de> <7c0c65f0-8a6f-a95c-f88b-b826837f4b41@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:18:03 +0100 (CET) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:17:59 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] Searching designated initialisers with SmPL X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Sun, 27 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > > static struct platform_driver driver = { . remove = acrtion, }; > > > > There is no need for any form of ... > > I feel still unsure about the omission of SmPL ellipses > for the search of designated initialisers. > > > > On the other hand the trailing comma is required. > > Thanks for such information. > > Can this view change for the application of simpler search patterns? No. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci