From: Harald van Dijk <harald@gigawatt.nl>
To: Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org>,
DASH shell mailing list <dash@vger.kernel.org>,
busybox <busybox@busybox.net>,
Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash@gnu.org>,
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
Subject: Re: Bizarre interaction bug involving bash w/ lastpipe + Almquist 'wait'
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 19:29:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8b210f5-dd59-2c7f-05d4-be0a89316d3d@gigawatt.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10e3756b-5e8f-ba00-df0d-b36c93fa2281@inlv.org>
On 06/02/2020 16:12, Martijn Dekker wrote:
> This is probably the strangest bug (or maybe pair of bugs) I've run into
> in nearly five years of breaking shells by developing modernish.
>
> I've traced it to an interaction between bash >= 4.2 (i.e.: bash with
> shopt -s lastpipe) and variants of the Almquist shell, at least: dash,
> gwsh, Busybox ash, FreeBSD sh, and NetBSD 9.0rc2 sh.
>
> Symptom: if 'return' is invoked on bash in the last element of a pipe
> executed in the main shell environment, then if you subsequently 'exec'
> an Almquist shell variant so that it has the same PID, its 'wait'
> builtin breaks.
>
> I can consistently reproduce this on Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, NetBSD
> 9.0rc2, OpenBSD, and Solaris.
>
> To reproduce this, you need bash >= 4.2, some Almquist shell variant,
> and these two test scripts:
>
> ---begin test.bash---
> fn() {
> : | return
> }
> shopt -s lastpipe || exit
> fn
> exec "${1:-dash}" test.ash
> ---end test.bash---
>
> ---begin test.ash---
> echo '*ash-begin'
> : &
> echo '*ash-middle'
> wait "$!"
> echo '*ash-end'
> ---end test.ash---
>
> When executing test.bash with dash, gwsh, Busybox ash, or FreeBSD sh,
> then test.ash simply waits forever on executing 'wait "$!"'.
Nice test. bash leaves the process in a state where SIGCHLD is blocked,
and the various ash-based shells do not unblock it. Because of that,
they do not pick up on the fact that the child process has terminated. I
would consider this a bug both in bash and in the ash-based shells.
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 16:12 Bizarre interaction bug involving bash w/ lastpipe + Almquist 'wait' Martijn Dekker
2020-02-06 19:29 ` Harald van Dijk [this message]
2020-02-07 11:19 ` AW: " Walter Harms
2020-02-07 14:33 ` Martijn Dekker
2020-02-07 16:16 ` Chet Ramey
2020-02-06 20:43 ` Robert Elz
2020-02-07 2:41 ` Robert Elz
2020-02-08 18:39 ` Harald van Dijk
2020-02-09 19:03 ` Jilles Tjoelker
2020-02-18 16:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2020-02-18 21:59 ` Harald van Dijk
2020-02-18 18:17 ` Robert Elz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8b210f5-dd59-2c7f-05d4-be0a89316d3d@gigawatt.nl \
--to=harald@gigawatt.nl \
--cc=bug-bash@gnu.org \
--cc=busybox@busybox.net \
--cc=dash@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jilles@stack.nl \
--cc=kre@munnari.OZ.AU \
--cc=martijn@inlv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).