From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 1/6] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:38:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71db5ccf-c9b3-68b0-4d48-93e2b1ba0d98@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45aae09df5c301497efc697c17921e9b2a3c8ae8.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks Mimi for your overall feedback on this series.
Really appreciate it.
On 2020-10-22 12:39 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 12:20 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> index fe1df373c113..31a772d8a86b 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>> @@ -451,15 +451,19 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * ima_match_keyring - determine whether the keyring matches the measure rule
>> - * @rule: a pointer to a rule
>> - * @keyring: name of the keyring to match against the measure rule
>> + * ima_match_rule_data - determine whether the given func_data matches
>> + * the measure rule data
>> + * @rule: IMA policy rule
>> + * @opt_list: rule data to match func_data against
>> + * @func_data: data to match against the measure rule data
>> * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation
>> *
>> - * Returns true if keyring matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
>> + * Returns true if func_data matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
>> */
>> -static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
>> - const char *keyring, const struct cred *cred)
>> +static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
>> + const struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list,
>> + const char *func_data,
>> + const struct cred *cred)
>> {
>> bool matched = false;
>> size_t i;
>> @@ -467,14 +471,14 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
>> if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !rule->uid_op(cred->uid, rule->uid))
>> return false;
>>
>> - if (!rule->keyrings)
>> + if (!opt_list)
>> return true;
>
> The opt_list should be based on rule->func. There shouldn't be a need
> to pass it as a variable.
>
> Mimi
Makes sense. Will do. Thanks Mimi.
~Tushar
>
>>
>> - if (!keyring)
>> + if (!func_data)
>> return false;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < rule->keyrings->count; i++) {
>> - if (!strcmp(rule->keyrings->items[i], keyring)) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < opt_list->count; i++) {
>> + if (!strcmp(opt_list->items[i], func_data)) {
>> matched = true;
>> break;
>> }
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 19:20 [PATCH v4 0/6] IMA: Infrastructure for measurement of critical kernel data Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs Tushar Sugandhi
2020-10-22 19:39 ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2020-10-23 22:38 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] IMA: conditionally allow empty rule data Tushar Sugandhi
2020-10-22 20:38 ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2020-10-23 22:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] IMA: update process_buffer_measurement to measure buffer hash Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] IMA: add policy to measure critical data from kernel components Tushar Sugandhi
2020-10-22 21:15 ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2020-10-23 22:50 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] IMA: add hook " Tushar Sugandhi
2020-10-22 22:35 ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2020-10-23 22:54 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-23 19:20 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] IMA: validate supported kernel data sources before measurement Tushar Sugandhi
2020-10-25 3:35 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 0/6] IMA: Infrastructure for measurement of critical kernel data Mimi Zohar
2020-10-27 17:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71db5ccf-c9b3-68b0-4d48-93e2b1ba0d98@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).