dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] completion: move blk_wait_io to kernel/sched/completion.c
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:06:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZitEd_CzSgqy2Kd0@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422105956.GN30852@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A bit like TASK_NOLOAD (which is used to make TASK_IDLE work), but
> different I suppose.
> 
> TASK_NOHUNG would be trivial to add ofc. But is it worth it?

Yes.  And it would allow us to kill the horrible existing block hack.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-26  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 17:49 [PATCH 1/2] completion: move blk_wait_io to kernel/sched/completion.c Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-17 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-17 18:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-18  4:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:30       ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-18 14:46         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 15:09           ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-22 10:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-23 12:36         ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-04-26  6:06         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-22 10:54     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZitEd_CzSgqy2Kd0@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).