From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Sudhakar Panneerselvam <sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com>
Cc: Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com, ssudhakarp@gmail.com,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-crypt@saout.de, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Shirley Ma <shirley.ma@oracle.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm crypt: Allow unaligned buffer lengths for skcipher devices
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:26:59 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009241314280.28814@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <252587bb-c0b7-47c9-a97b-91422f8f9c47@default>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Sudhakar Panneerselvam wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Biggers [mailto:ebiggers@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:14 PM
> > To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Sudhakar Panneerselvam <sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com>;
> > Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com; ssudhakarp@gmail.com; Martin Petersen
> > <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; dm-crypt@saout.de; dm-devel@redhat.com;
> > Shirley Ma <shirley.ma@oracle.com>; mpatocka@redhat.com; Milan Broz
> > <gmazyland@gmail.com>; agk@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm crypt: Allow unaligned buffer
> > lengths for skcipher devices
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:27:32PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > You've clearly done a nice job with these changes. Looks clean.
> > >
> > > BUT, I'm struggling to just accept that dm-crypt needs to go to these
> > > extra lengths purely because of one bad apple usecase.
> > >
> > > These alignment constraints aren't new. Are there other portions of
> > > Linux's crypto subsystem that needed comparable fixes in order to work
> > > with Microsfot OS initiated IO through a guest?
> > >
> > > You forecast that these same kinds of changes are needed for AEAD and
> > > dm-integrity... that's alarming.
> > >
> > > Are we _certain_ there is no other way forward?
> > > (Sorry I don't have suggestions.. I'm in "fact finding mode" ;)
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand why this is needed, since dm-crypt already sets its
> > logical_block_size to its crypto sector_size. Isn't it expected that I/O that
> > isn't aligned to logical_block_size fails? It's the I/O submitter's
> > responsibility to ensure logical_block_size alignment of all I/O segments.
> > Exactly how is the misaligned I/O actually being submitted here?
>
> You are right that each I/O size should be a multiple of the block
> device's sector size, but I am not sure if there is any constraint that
> individual segment lengths should be aligned to its sector size, could
> you help me with how this is enforced in block layer? The closest I see
> is "dma_alignment" member in "struct request_queue" of the low-level
> block device driver and as mentioned in the patch description, iSCSI,
> MegaRaid, qla2xxx, nvme and others have much relaxed constraint.
>
> To your other question, the IO stack looks like this:
>
> Windows Guest <--> Vhost-Scsi <--> LIO(scsi/target/blockio) <--> dm-crypt <--> iSCSI block device
>
> One real example out of my debugging: Windows sends a I/O request with
> 6656 bytes to vhost-scsi interface. Vhost-scsi uses translate_desc() in
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c to convert windows user space memory buffers to
> kernel iovecs. Vhost-scsi then converts the iovecs to sg entries in
> vhost_scsi_mapal() which is then handed over to "target" subsystem and
> eventually submitted to dm-crypt. This 6656 bytes IO has got 3 segments,
> first segment had 1584, second 4096 and the last had 976 bytes. Dm-crypt
> rejects the I/O after seeing the first segment length 1584 which is not
> a 512 byte multiple.
>
> Let me know if there are further questions.
>
> Thanks
> Sudhakar
Hi
I think it should be fixed in vhost-scsi.
Mikulas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 18:40 [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm crypt: Allow unaligned buffer lengths for skcipher devices Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-16 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dm crypt: Allow unaligned bio " Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-16 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm crypt: Handle unaligned bio buffer lengths for lmk and tcw Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-23 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] dm crypt: Allow unaligned buffer lengths for skcipher devices Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 1:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-24 5:14 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-24 8:15 ` Milan Broz
2020-09-24 16:55 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 16:44 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 17:26 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2020-09-24 17:38 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 17:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-09-24 18:11 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 18:44 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-09-24 19:13 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-25 1:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-09-25 20:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-24 12:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-09-24 15:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
2020-09-24 12:40 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-09-24 17:12 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.02.2009241314280.28814@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shirley.ma@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=ssudhakarp@gmail.com \
--cc=sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).