dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod <vkoul@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM" 
	<dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add document for K3 BCDMA
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:06:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f532784-c46d-6746-2511-466fd82c0809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJnk=ycRurUTBwWgX1+vOq_MZuevegvK2MwGJHkHW50mg@mail.gmail.com>



On 08/10/2020 22.15, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:40 AM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:

>>> Yeah, you have to do 'unevaluatedProperties: false' which doesn't
>>> actually do anything yet, but can 'see' into $ref's.
>>
>> I see, but even if I add the unevaluatedProperties: false I will have
>> the same error as long as I have additionalProperties: false
> 
> Yes. I meant unevaluatedProperties instead of additionalProperties.

OK, changed it to unevaluatedProperties.

>> If I remove the additionalProperties then it makes no difference if I
>> have the unevaluatedProperties: false or I don't.
> 
> Not yet, but it will soon. Once I have the tree in a consistent state
> in 5.10-rc1, there will be a meta-schema to check all this (which is
> one of those must always be present).
> 
> Though, as of now 'unevaluatedProperties' doesn't do anything because
> the underlying json-schema tool doesn't yet support it.

Understand, thanks for the details.

>>>>>> +  ti,sci-rm-range-bchan:
>>>>>> +    description: |
>>>>>> +      Array of BCDMA block-copy channel resource subtypes for resource
>>>>>> +      allocation for this host
>>>>>> +    allOf:
>>>>>> +      - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>>>>> +    minItems: 1
>>>>>> +    # Should be enough
>>>>>> +    maxItems: 255
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there constraints for the individual elements?
>>>>
>>>> In practice the subtype ID is 6bits number.
>>>> Should I add limits to individual elements?
>>>
>>> Yes:
>>>
>>> items:
>>>   maximum: 0x3f
>>
>> Right, I can just omit the minimum.
>>
>> It would be nice if I could use definitions for these ranges to avoid
>> duplicated lines by adding
>>
>> definitions:
>>   ti,rm-range:
>>     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>     minItems: 1
>>     # Should be enough
>>     maxItems: 255
>>     items:
>>       minimum: 0
>>       maximum: 0x3f
>>
>> to schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml
>>
>> and only have:
>>
>>   ti,sci-rm-range-bchan:
>>     $ref:
>> /schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml#/definitions/ti,rm-range
>>     description: |
>>       Array of BCDMA block-copy channel resource subtypes for resource
>>       allocation for this host
> 
> Just do:
> 
> patternProperties:
>   "^ti,sci-rm-range-[btr]chan$":
>     ...
> 
> If this is common for other bindings, then you can put it in
> ti,k3-sci-common.yaml.

Similar property (for RM ranges) also used by the ringacc, I have tried
to standardize us to use: ti,sci-rm-range-* in DT.

I will leave it as it is now for this series and we can simplify it
later with a wider series touching all involved yaml files.

>> but it results:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml:
>> properties:ti,sci-rm-range-bchan: {'$ref':
>> '/schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml#/definitions/ti,rm-range',
>> 'description': 'Array of BCDMA block-copy channel resource subtypes for
>> resource\nallocation for this host\n'} is not valid under any of the
>> given schemas (Possible causes of the failure):
>>         Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml:
>> properties:ti,sci-rm-range-bchan: 'not' is a required property
>>         Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml:
>> properties:ti,sci-rm-range-bchan:$ref:
>> '/schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml#/definitions/ti,rm-range'
>> does not match 'types.yaml#[/]{0,1}definitions/.*'
> 
> We probably should allow for using 'definitions' which is pretty
> common json-schema practice, but don't primarily in order to keep
> folks within the lines. Things are optimized for not knowing
> json-schema and trying to minimize errors I have to check for.

I agree on these.

> Supporting it would complicate the meta-schema and the tools' fixup
> code. So far, the need for it has been pretty infrequent.

Sure, for the couple of duplication I have it is manageable without
sacrificing readability.

btw: I have made the similar changes to the k3-pktdma schema.

> 
> Rob
> 

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30  9:13 [PATCH 00/18] dmaengine/soc: k3-udma: Add support for BCDMA and PKTDMA Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:13 ` [PATCH 01/18] dmaengine: of-dma: Add support for optional router configuration callback Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-07  5:44   ` Vinod Koul
2020-10-07  8:08     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-07 15:55       ` Vinod Koul
2020-10-08  6:41         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-28  5:55           ` Vinod Koul
2020-10-28  9:56             ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-11-09 11:45               ` Vinod Koul
2020-11-09 12:09                 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-11-09 12:23                   ` Vinod Koul
2020-11-09 12:36                     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:13 ` [PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: Add support for per channel coherency handling Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:13 ` [PATCH 03/18] dmaengine: doc: client: Update for dmaengine_get_dma_device() usage Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:13 ` [PATCH 04/18] dmaengine: dmatest: Use dmaengine_get_dma_device Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:13 ` [PATCH 05/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Wait for peer teardown completion if supported Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 06/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add support for second resource range from sysfw Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 07/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to get device pointer for DMA API Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-07  6:53   ` Vinod Koul
2020-10-07  8:22     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 08/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Configure the dma_dev for rings Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 09/18] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add document for K3 BCDMA Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-01  6:49   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-06 19:23     ` Rob Herring
2020-10-06 19:29   ` Rob Herring
2020-10-07  9:09     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-07 15:46       ` Rob Herring
2020-10-08  8:40         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-08 19:15           ` Rob Herring
2020-10-09  8:06             ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 10/18] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add document for K3 PKTDMA Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 11/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-psil: Extend psil_endpoint_config " Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 12/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-psil: Add initial map for AM64 Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 13/18] dmaengine: ti: Add support for k3 event routers Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 14/18] soc: ti: k3-ringacc: add AM64 DMA rings support Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 15/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Initial support for K3 BCDMA Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 16/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add support for BCDMA channel TPL handling Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 17/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Initial support for K3 PKTDMA Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30  9:14 ` [PATCH 18/18] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add " Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 10:17 ` [PATCH 00/18] dmaengine/soc: k3-udma: Add support for BCDMA and PKTDMA Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f532784-c46d-6746-2511-466fd82c0809@ti.com \
    --to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).