From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB5FC31E44 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3630E21734 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:35:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560292513; bh=OSw+/K5bvoTr1HEC9Y/CwqLjEc5nFO9PjsF4Pibd8Go=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Boc/vYsMadEUXnqWCske0AFFtHEnITVAjox4aBrkmO//TFEc9Be9UJshXWbW5aH2Y yI/4RwzDfONsMK20vAq+S+XCkHkm96oTMlXWw8wMNsdsgPWp2hjsdbkGcGFMeK81Xl gDOsyGs7CC6f/law8OdiBT0W3c+p6R5bPwFxXxEI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2407103AbfFKWfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:35:12 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:45824 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405174AbfFKWfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:35:12 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id e3so11296069ioc.12; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:35:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NCgQwxsu0f3r4btRqej5pZhVli0wu2GBc0gKWgavRis=; b=Nn7j2RkQ7LwCq7tRGrwPzOkfh0I79XGw9slQaYNAoRVNjaJLdJs7IQakHEU8aZJDgl ORN60sXcuYxeQIbcvccw899YbDkzhQWTBykmehNWCSL5IGislKAlVPR8aMDHdoSWfhGA U747IGH1l95gR5x+yC+rMVKqoSoV3X04B9jKiZB9PwL8vTpuU8khEpnC7WBc7wn7O3UW dSG/McsLdIqowtlbv8pXXyoAgapRGz/LrMYWJIVQU/2QMzc9QMay7lRANnQD5tIO5yNb y21qyzxwqbWLs0es9LmGgQX6N78wTpHBGd30Jw887uoXBBYGQWvsY4a3m5XxLGic5tgk AFgw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVTYrVM2i5Jfc7ljuocImzytGE5XP34gK5tLfXW/EE+8U0CQy7w R2YH3n9jTEGQSkOxeP43Fw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyldbzjVVfHCAHQd21SudrsdTqB9IH5YfFTe83h4l7n3V0qepl2ZRh+aD/yH4IiOo6MWE21IQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2256:: with SMTP id o22mr19307948ioo.95.1560292511617; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-174-149-252-64.englco.spcsdns.net. [174.149.252.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q142sm1884761itb.17.2019.06.11.15.35.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:35:07 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: yibin.gong@nxp.com Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, broonie@kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] dma: imx-sdma: add i.mx6ul/6sx compatible name Message-ID: <20190611223507.GA25722@bogus> References: <20190610081753.11422-1-yibin.gong@nxp.com> <20190610081753.11422-11-yibin.gong@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190610081753.11422-11-yibin.gong@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: dmaengine-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:17:48 +0800, yibin.gong@nxp.com wrote: > From: Robin Gong > > Add i.mx6ul and i.mx6sx compatible name in binding doc. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-imx-sdma.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.