From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
soc@kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 19:36:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809183658.GA13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9_cmdDbBm0ookyqGJMcyLVFHkYHuR3mEeawQKS2UqYJoWWaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> [ add Martin (if cyrius.com address is still valid) ]
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 9:35 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > There are three families of IOP machines we support in Linux: iop32x
> > (which includes EP80219), iop33x and iop13xx (aka IOP34x aka WP8134x).
> >
> > All products we support in the kernel are based on the first of these,
> > iop32x, the other families only ever supported the Intel reference
> > boards but no actual machine anyone could ever buy.
> >
> > While one could clearly make them all three work in a single kernel
> > with some work, this takes the easy way out, removing the later two
> > platforms entirely, under the assumption that there are no remaining
> > users.
> >
> > Earlier versions of OpenWRT and Debian both had support for iop32x
> > but not the others, and they both dropped iop32x as well in their 2015
> > releases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > I'm just guessing that iop32x is still needed, and the other two are
> > not. If anyone disagrees with that assessment, let me know so we
> > can come up with an alternative approach.
>
> I'm not sure who would scream if iop32x support went away as well, but
> I have not followed this space in years hence copying Martin.
>
> In any event:
>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Those of us who have and still run Thecus N2100's, for example?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190809162956.488941-1-arnd@arndb.de>
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] dma: iop-adma: include prefetch.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-14 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] dma: iop-adma: allow building without platform headers Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: xscale: fix multi-cpu compilation Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-23 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: iop32x: make mach/uncompress.h independent of mach/hardware.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: iop32x: merge everything into mach-iop32x/ Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Wolfram Sang
2019-08-09 18:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-08-09 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-12 9:44 ` Martin Michlmayr
2019-08-14 8:36 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-14 10:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-16 15:42 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-16 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-16 16:15 ` Aaro Koskinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190809183658.GA13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=tbm@cyrius.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).