From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] dmaengine: omap-dma: make omap_dma_filter_fn private
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:44:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1P4LyOieH1ii0vn_5rdj-NC4ft6JKCKs6YX88Qdk5SSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722143533.GX12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:36 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 22-07-19, 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:13 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22-07-19, 10:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > With the audio driver no longer referring to this function, it
> > > > can be made private to the dmaengine driver itself, and the
> > > > header file removed.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190307151646.1016966-1-arnd@arndb.de/
> > >
> > > This seems to point to older rev, my script updated it to latest one.
> >
> > That was intentional, to see the replies to the last time it got
> > posted. I'm not sure if that's the best way to do it, would you
> > rather not have that included?
>
> That's a valid point, but should we add both the links or just relevant
> one, common sense says former, scripting tends to add so keep both...?
>
> I am thinking of not changing the one submitted and let my
> script append. Is that fine?
I think adding both is best then.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-22 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-22 8:16 [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] dmaengine: omap-dma: make omap_dma_filter_fn private Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] dmaengine: edma: make edma_filter_fn private Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] dmaengine: omap-dma: make omap_dma_filter_fn private Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 14:10 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-22 14:12 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-22 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 14:35 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-22 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-07-22 15:23 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a1P4LyOieH1ii0vn_5rdj-NC4ft6JKCKs6YX88Qdk5SSg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).