dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix unnecessary stack usage
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:05:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3TE2hu=gjyf5gVj3HufVacFSoc4WjOVpgP3bz0LBbGKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB401006CA0446C71E36786E75DAE70@DM6PR12MB4010.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:21 AM Gustavo Pimentel
<Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 14:16:45, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> > Putting large constant data on the stack causes unnecessary overhead
> > and stack usage:
> >
> > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c:285:6: error: stack frame size of 1376 bytes in function 'dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> I had that warning at the beginning of the development, that's why I
> divided the debugfs entries into several subfunctions. Perhaps my
> configuration has configured a bigger stack frame size than your
> configuration.

I suspect the problem is CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_VERBOSE,
which is a farily new configuration option that has the unintended side-effect
of sometimes preventing the compiler combining local variables from functions
inlined into the caller. Adding 'noinline_for_stack' to the sub-functions would
have also prevented this, but I think just not having the strings on the
stack is better anyway.

        Arnd

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-21  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 13:16 [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix unnecessary stack usage Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-21  8:21 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-06-21  9:05   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a3TE2hu=gjyf5gVj3HufVacFSoc4WjOVpgP3bz0LBbGKQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).