Re: [PATCH 0/2] amba/platform: Initialize dma_parms at the bus level

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>]

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 20:15, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-27 3:34 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 04:02, BOUGH CHEN <haibo.chen@nxp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: BOUGH CHEN
> >>> Sent: 2020年3月26日 12:41
> >>> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>;
> >>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>;
> >>> Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>;
> >>> Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>; Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>;
> >>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] amba/platform: Initialize dma_parms at the bus level
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >>>> Sent: 2020年3月25日 19:34
> >>>> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; Rafael J .
> >>>> Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>;
> >>>> Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>; Linus Walleij
> >>>> <linus.walleij@linaro.org>; Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>; BOUGH CHEN
> >>>> <haibo.chen@nxp.com>; Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>;
> >>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Ulf
> >>>> Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] amba/platform: Initialize dma_parms at the bus
> >>>> level
> >>>>
> >>>> It's currently the amba/platform driver's responsibility to initialize
> >>>> the pointer, dma_parms, for its corresponding struct device. The
> >>>> benefit with this approach allows us to avoid the initialization and
> >>>> to not waste memory for the struct device_dma_parameters, as this can
> >>>> be decided on a case by case basis.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, it has turned out that this approach is not very practical.
> >>>> Not only does it lead to open coding, but also to real errors. In
> >>>> principle callers of
> >>>> dma_set_max_seg_size() doesn't check the error code, but just assumes
> >>>> it succeeds.
> >>>>
> >>>> For these reasons, this series initializes the dma_parms from the
> >>>> amba/platform bus at the device registration point. This also follows
> >>>> the way the PCI devices are being managed, see pci_device_add().
> >>>>
> >>>> If it turns out that this is an acceptable solution, we probably also
> >>>> want the changes for stable, but I am not sure if it applies without conflicts.
> >>>>
> >>>> The series is based on v5.6-rc7.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ulf,
> >>>
> >>> Since i.MXQM SMMU related code still not upstream yet, so I apply your
> >>> patches on our internal Linux branch based on v5.4.24, and find it do not work
> >>> on my side. Maybe for platform core drivers, there is a gap between v5.4.24
> >>> and v5.6-rc7 which has the impact.
> >>> I will try to put our SMMU related code into v5.6-rc7, then do the test again.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Ulf,
> >>
> >> On the latest Linux-next branch, the top commit 89295c59c1f063b533d071ca49d0fa0c0783ca6f (tag: next-20200326), after add your two patches, I just add the simple debug code as following in the /driver/mmc/core/queue.c, but seems still not work as our expect, logically, it should work, so can you or anyone test on other platform? This seems weird.
> >
> > You are right, this doesn't work for platform devices being added
> > through the OF path.
> >
> > In other words, of_platform_device_create_pdata() manually allocates
> > the platform device and assigns it the &platform_bus_type, but without
> > calling platform_device_add().
> >
> > For amba, it works fine, as in that OF path, amba_device_add() is called. Hmm.
> >
> > I re-spin this, to address the problem. Perhaps we simply need to use
> > the ->probe() path.
>
> FWIW we already have setup_pdev_dma_masks(), so it might be logical to
> include dma_parms in there too.

Yep, thanks for the suggestion. This work fine.

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe