dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sanjay R Mehta <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com, Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com,
	Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com, robh@kernel.org,
	mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Initial driver for the AMD PTDMA
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:09:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL+rUBGUJoFLS902@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622654551-9204-2-git-send-email-Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>

On 02-06-21, 12:22, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:

> +static int pt_core_execute_cmd(struct ptdma_desc *desc, struct pt_cmd_queue *cmd_q)
> +{
> +	bool soc = FIELD_GET(DWORD0_SOC, desc->dw0);
> +	u8 *q_desc = (u8 *)&cmd_q->qbase[cmd_q->qidx];
> +	u8 *dp = (u8 *)desc;

this case seems unnecessary?

> +int pt_core_perform_passthru(struct pt_cmd_queue *cmd_q,
> +			     struct pt_passthru_engine *pt_engine)

Pls align this to preceding open brace, checkpatch with --strict would
warn you about this

> +static irqreturn_t pt_core_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct pt_device *pt = data;
> +	struct pt_cmd_queue *cmd_q = &pt->cmd_q;
> +	u32 status;
> +
> +	pt_core_disable_queue_interrupts(pt);
> +
> +	status = ioread32(cmd_q->reg_interrupt_status);
> +	if (status) {
> +		cmd_q->int_status = status;
> +		cmd_q->q_status = ioread32(cmd_q->reg_status);
> +		cmd_q->q_int_status = ioread32(cmd_q->reg_int_status);
> +
> +		/* On error, only save the first error value */
> +		if ((status & INT_ERROR) && !cmd_q->cmd_error)
> +			cmd_q->cmd_error = CMD_Q_ERROR(cmd_q->q_status);
> +
> +		/* Acknowledge the interrupt */
> +		iowrite32(status, cmd_q->reg_interrupt_status);
> +	}
> +
> +	pt_core_enable_queue_interrupts(pt);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;

should you always return IRQ_HANDLED, that sounds apt for the if loop
but not for the non loop case

> +int pt_core_init(struct pt_device *pt)
> +{
> +	char dma_pool_name[MAX_DMAPOOL_NAME_LEN];
> +	struct pt_cmd_queue *cmd_q = &pt->cmd_q;
> +	u32 dma_addr_lo, dma_addr_hi;
> +	struct device *dev = pt->dev;
> +	struct dma_pool *dma_pool;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Allocate a dma pool for the queue */
> +	snprintf(dma_pool_name, sizeof(dma_pool_name), "%s_q", pt->name);
> +
> +	dma_pool = dma_pool_create(dma_pool_name, dev,
> +				   PT_DMAPOOL_MAX_SIZE,
> +				   PT_DMAPOOL_ALIGN, 0);
> +	if (!dma_pool) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate dma pool\n");

This is superfluous, allocator would warn on failure

> +static struct pt_device *pt_alloc_struct(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pt_device *pt;
> +
> +	pt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pt), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (!pt)
> +		return NULL;
> +	pt->dev = dev;
> +	pt->ord = atomic_inc_return(&pt_ordinal);

What is the use of this number?

> +static int pt_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct pt_device *pt;
> +	struct pt_msix *pt_msix;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	void __iomem * const *iomap_table;
> +	int bar_mask;
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pt = pt_alloc_struct(dev);
> +	if (!pt)
> +		goto e_err;
> +
> +	pt_msix = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pt_msix), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pt_msix)
> +		goto e_err;
> +
> +	pt->pt_msix = pt_msix;
> +	pt->dev_vdata = (struct pt_dev_vdata *)id->driver_data;
> +	if (!pt->dev_vdata) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		dev_err(dev, "missing driver data\n");
> +		goto e_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "pcim_enable_device failed (%d)\n", ret);
> +		goto e_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	bar_mask = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> +	ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, bar_mask, "ptdma");
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "pcim_iomap_regions failed (%d)\n", ret);
> +		goto e_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	iomap_table = pcim_iomap_table(pdev);
> +	if (!iomap_table) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "pcim_iomap_table failed\n");
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto e_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	pt->io_regs = iomap_table[pt->dev_vdata->bar];
> +	if (!pt->io_regs) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "ioremap failed\n");
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto e_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = pt_get_irqs(pt);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto e_err;
> +
> +	pci_set_master(pdev);
> +
> +	ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(48));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "dma_set_mask_and_coherent failed (%d)\n",
> +				ret);
> +			goto e_err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, pt);
> +
> +	if (pt->dev_vdata)
> +		ret = pt_core_init(pt);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto e_err;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "PTDMA enabled\n");

pls remove these...

> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/dmapool.h>
> +
> +#define MAX_PT_NAME_LEN			16
> +#define MAX_DMAPOOL_NAME_LEN		32
> +
> +#define MAX_HW_QUEUES			1
> +#define MAX_CMD_QLEN			100
> +
> +#define PT_ENGINE_PASSTHRU		5
> +#define PT_OFFSET			0x0
> +
> +#define PT_VSIZE			16
> +#define PT_VMASK			((unsigned int)((1 << PT_VSIZE) - 1))

why cast?

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-02 17:22 [PATCH v9 0/3] Add support for AMD PTDMA controller driver Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Initial driver for the AMD PTDMA Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-08 17:39   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-06-15 11:20     ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16  4:15       ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-16  4:54         ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16  6:16           ` Greg KH
2021-06-16  6:57             ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16  7:17               ` Greg KH
2021-06-16  7:52               ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-16  7:59                 ` Greg KH
2021-06-16  9:46                   ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16  9:56                     ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-16 12:00                 ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16 12:23                   ` Greg KH
2021-06-16 12:53                     ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16 12:57                       ` Greg KH
2021-06-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] dmaengine: ptdma: register PTDMA controller as a DMA resource Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-08 18:56   ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-15 11:34     ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-16  4:18       ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-16  5:23         ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-20  3:52     ` Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-02 17:22 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Add debugfs entries for PTDMA Sanjay R Mehta
2021-06-09 14:10   ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-15 11:18     ` Sanjay R Mehta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YL+rUBGUJoFLS902@vkoul-mobl \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
    --cc=Sanju.Mehta@amd.com \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).