Re: [PATCH 01/16] firmware: ti_sci: Add resource management APIs for ringacc, psi-l and udma

[Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>]

Hi Peter,

On 06/05/19 6:04 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

Patch has the following checkpatch warnings and checks which can be fixed:

WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#262: FILE: drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2286:
+static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#323: FILE: drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2347:
+static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#383: FILE: drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2407:
+static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_flow_cfg1(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#1414: FILE: include/linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h:455:
+	int (*rx_flow_cfg)(

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 4 checks, 1399 lines checked



> ---
>  drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c              | 439 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/ti_sci.h              | 704 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h | 216 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 1359 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 64d895b80bc3..af3ebcdeab18 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c

[..snip.]

> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_psil_pair(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> +				   u32 nav_id, u32 src_thread, u32 dst_thread)
> +{

All the psil ops doesn't have the  kernel-doc function comments. Just be
consistent with other functions :)


> +	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
> +	struct ti_sci_msg_psil_pair *req;
> +	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
> +	struct ti_sci_info *info;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(handle))
> +		return PTR_ERR(handle);
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> +	dev = info->dev;
> +
> +	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_PSIL_PAIR,
> +				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> +				   sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> +	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> +		dev_err(dev, "RM_PSIL:Message reconfig failed(%d)\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	req = (struct ti_sci_msg_psil_pair *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> +	req->nav_id = nav_id;
> +	req->src_thread = src_thread;
> +	req->dst_thread = dst_thread;
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "RM_PSIL:Mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	resp = (struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> +	ret = ti_sci_is_response_ack(resp) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +
> +fail:
> +	ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +

[..snip..]

> + */
> +struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req {
> +	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr hdr;
> +	u32 valid_params;
> +	u16 nav_id;
> +	u16 index;
> +	u32 addr_lo;
> +	u32 addr_hi;
> +	u32 count;
> +	u8 mode;
> +	u8 size;
> +	u8 order_id;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_resp - Response to configuring a ring.
> + *
> + * @hdr:	Generic Header
> + */
> +struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_resp {
> +	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr hdr;
> +} __packed;

If it is a generic ACK, NACK response, just use the header directly.

[..snip..]

> + */
> +struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req {
> +	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr hdr;
> +	u32 valid_params;
> +	u16 nav_id;
> +	u16 index;
> +	u16 rx_fetch_size;
> +	u16 rxcq_qnum;
> +	u8 rx_priority;
> +	u8 rx_qos;
> +	u8 rx_orderid;
> +	u8 rx_sched_priority;
> +	u16 flowid_start;
> +	u16 flowid_cnt;
> +	u8 rx_pause_on_err;
> +	u8 rx_atype;
> +	u8 rx_chan_type;
> +	u8 rx_ignore_short;
> +	u8 rx_ignore_long;
> +	u8 rx_burst_size;
> +

extra line?

> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**


Thanks and regards,
Lokesh