dmaengine.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Polled completion support
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:24:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe201b5b-916d-1889-31b0-dcac20733b65@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190729064209.GF12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>

Vinod,

On 29/07/2019 9.42, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 16-07-19, 11:26, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> - Split the DMA_COMPLETE and !txstate check as Vinod suggested
>>
>> Change since v3:
>> - fix DMA pointer tracking for memcpy
>> - completion polling is only done when it is asked by not providing
>>   DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT for memcpy
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Fix typo in the comment for patch 0
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Cleanup patch for the array register handling
>> - typo fixed in patch2 commit message
>>
>> The code around the array register access was pretty confusing for the first
>> look, so clean them up first then use the cleaner way in the polled handling.
>>
>> When a DMA client driver does not set the DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT because it
>> does not want to use interrupts for DMA completion or because it can not
>> rely on DMA interrupts due to executing the memcpy when interrupts are
>> disabled it will poll the status of the transfer.
>>
>> Since we can not tell from any EDMA register that the transfer is
>> completed, we can only know that the paRAM set has been sent to TPTC for
>> processing we need to check the residue of the transfer, if it is 0 then
>> the transfer is completed.
>>
>> The polled completion can bve tested by applying:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10966499/

Should I resend this patch so the polled mode can be tested in upstream?

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-29  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-16  8:26 [PATCH v5 0/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Polled completion support Peter Ujfalusi
2019-07-16  8:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Clean up the 2x32bit array register accesses Peter Ujfalusi
2019-07-16  8:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Correct the residue calculation (fix for memcpy) Peter Ujfalusi
2019-07-25 13:46   ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-16  8:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Support for polled (memcpy) completion Peter Ujfalusi
2019-07-29  6:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] dmaengine: ti: edma: Polled completion support Vinod Koul
2019-07-29  7:22   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-07-29  7:33     ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-29  7:24   ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2019-07-29  7:33     ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe201b5b-916d-1889-31b0-dcac20733b65@ti.com \
    --to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).