dev.dpdk.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v4] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:26:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153D6977C@SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E3B9F2FDCB65864C82CD632F23D8AB877339C306@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Haiyue
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 10:18 AM
> To: Zhang, Xiao <xiao.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [v4] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Xiao
> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 19:00
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> > <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Zhang,
> > Xiao <xiao.zhang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [v4] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16
> >
> > The code checked the NVM API version of FW to check if support adminq
> > operation, when version is 1.7 or above adminq operation is support
> > and the adminq flag will be set. The code will use adminq to set TPID
> > if the flags set or to use register. The NVM API version of SFP X722
> > old versions are lowwer than 1.7 and for FW4.16 is 1.8. But FW4.16 of
> > SFP
> > X722 does not support adminq operation, the legacy logic is not
> > compatible with device SFP X722 currently. Check the device id to
> > unset adminq flag to use resigter setting to make it work.
> >
> > Fixes: 73cd7d6dc8e1 ("net/i40e: use set switch AQ instead of register
> > setting")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> 
>     Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19  5:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18 17:13 [dpdk-dev] [DPDK] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16 Xiao Zhang
2019-07-18  8:23 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-18  8:25 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-18  8:32   ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-18 22:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19  0:56   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-07-19  1:02     ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-19  1:14       ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-19 10:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [v3] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19 10:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [v4] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19  2:17       ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-19  5:26         ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2019-07-19 15:30       ` Stillwell Jr, Paul M
2019-07-19 18:17         ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2019-07-20  0:53           ` Zhang, Xiao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153D6977C@SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).