From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, thomas@monjalon.net, jerinj@marvell.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com,
david.marchand@redhat.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
gavin.hu@arm.com, ravi1.kumar@amd.com, rmody@marvell.com,
shshaikh@marvell.com, xuanziyang2@huawei.com,
cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com, zhouguoyang@huawei.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:06:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574071619-10407-3-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574071619-10407-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1571125801-45773-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com>
Add test cases for set bit, clear bit, test and set bit,
test and clear bit operations.
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
---
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/autotest_data.py | 6 +
app/test/meson.build | 2 +
app/test/test_bitops.c | 303 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 312 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_bitops.c
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 57930c00b..4f3327492 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ SRCS-y += test_ticketlock.c
SRCS-y += test_memory.c
SRCS-y += test_memzone.c
SRCS-y += test_bitmap.c
+SRCS-y += test_bitops.c
SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division.c
SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division_perf.c
SRCS-y += test_fbarray.c
diff --git a/app/test/autotest_data.py b/app/test/autotest_data.py
index 6deb97bcc..e06344087 100644
--- a/app/test/autotest_data.py
+++ b/app/test/autotest_data.py
@@ -404,6 +404,12 @@
"Func": default_autotest,
"Report": None,
},
+ {
+ "Name": "Bitops autotest",
+ "Command": "bitops_autotest",
+ "Func": default_autotest,
+ "Report": None,
+ },
{
"Name": "Hash multiwriter autotest",
"Command": "hash_multiwriter_autotest",
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index ff59c3131..33b41353c 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_atomic.c',
'test_barrier.c',
'test_bitratestats.c',
+ 'test_bitops.c',
'test_bpf.c',
'test_byteorder.c',
'test_cmdline.c',
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ fast_test_names = [
'alarm_autotest',
'atomic_autotest',
'byteorder_autotest',
+ 'bitops_autotest',
'cmdline_autotest',
'common_autotest',
'cpuflags_autotest',
diff --git a/app/test/test_bitops.c b/app/test/test_bitops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9d0ac0299
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_bitops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2019 Arm Limited
+ */
+
+#include <rte_bitops.h>
+#include <rte_launch.h>
+#include "test.h"
+
+unsigned long val32 = 1UL << 10;
+unsigned long val64 = 1UL << 33;
+unsigned int synchro;
+unsigned int count32;
+unsigned int count64;
+
+#define MAX_BITS_32 32
+#define MAX_BITS_64 64
+/*
+ * Bitops functions
+ * ================
+ *
+ * - The main test function performs several subtests.
+ * - For relaxed version, check bit operations on one core.
+ * - Initialize valXX to specified values, then set each bit of valXX
+ * to 1 one by one in "test_bitops_set_relaxed".
+ *
+ * - Clear each bit of valXX to 0 one by one in "test_bitops_clear_relaxed".
+ *
+ * - Function "test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed" checks whether each bit
+ * of valXX can do "test and set" and "test and clear" correctly.
+ *
+ * - For C11 atomic barrier version, check bit operations on multi cores.
+ * - Per bit of valXX is set to 1, then cleared to 0 on each core in
+ * "test_bitops_set_clear". The function checks that once all lcores finish
+ * their set_clear, the value of valXX would still be zero.
+ *
+ * - The cores are waiting for a synchro which is triggered by the main test
+ * function. Then all cores would do "rte_test_and_set_bitXX" or
+ * "rte_test_and_clear_bitXX" at the same time, "countXX" which is checked
+ * as the result later would inc by one or not according to the original
+ * bit value.
+ *
+ */
+
+static int
+test_bitops_set_relaxed(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ rte_set_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (!rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+ printf("Failed to set bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ rte_set_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (!rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+ printf("Failed to set bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_clear_relaxed(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ rte_clear_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+ printf("Failed to clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ rte_clear_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+ printf("Failed to clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ rte_test_and_set_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (!rte_test_and_clear_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+ printf("Failed to set and test bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit32_relaxed(i, &val32)) {
+ printf("Failed to test and clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ rte_test_and_set_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (!rte_test_and_clear_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+ printf("Failed to set and test bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit64_relaxed(i, &val64)) {
+ printf("Failed to test and clear bit in relaxed version.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops_set_clear(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ rte_set_bit32(i, &val32);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ rte_clear_bit32(i, &val32);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ rte_set_bit64(i, &val64);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ rte_clear_bit64(i, &val64);
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_test_and_set_bitXX() returns the original bit value, then set it to 1.
+ * This functions checks that if the target bit is equal to 0, set it to 1 and
+ * increase the variable of "countXX" by one. If it is equal to 1, do nothing
+ * for "countXX". The value of "countXX" would be checked as the result later.
+ */
+static int
+test_bitops_test_set(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+
+{
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (!rte_test_and_set_bit32(i, &val32))
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&count32, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (!rte_test_and_set_bit64(i, &val64))
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&count64, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_test_and_set_bitXX() returns the original bit value, then clear it to 0.
+ * This functions checks that if the target bit is equal to 1, clear it to 0 and
+ * increase the variable of "countXX" by one. If it is equal to 0, do nothing
+ * for "countXX". The value of "countXX" would be checked as the result later.
+ */
+static int
+test_bitops_test_clear(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+
+{
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&synchro, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (rte_test_and_clear_bit32(i, &val32))
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&count32, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (rte_test_and_clear_bit64(i, &val64))
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&count64, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+test_bitops(void)
+{
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ if (test_bitops_set_relaxed() < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ if (test_bitops_clear_relaxed() < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ if (test_bitops_test_set_clear_relaxed() < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+
+ rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_set_clear, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_32; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit32(i, &val32)) {
+ printf("Failed to set and clear bit on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS_64; i++)
+ if (rte_get_bit64(i, &val64)) {
+ printf("Failed to set and clear bit on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Launch all slave lcores to do "rte_bitops_test_and_set_bitXX"
+ * respectively.
+ * Each lcore should have MAX_BITS_XX chances to check the target bit.
+ * If it's equal to 0, set it to 1 and "countXX (which is initialized
+ * to 0)" would be increased by one. If the target bit is 1, still set
+ * it to 1 and do nothing for "countXX". There would be only one lcore
+ * that finds the target bit is 0.
+ * If the final value of "countXX" is equal to MAX_BITS_XX, all slave
+ * lcores performed "rte_bitops_test_and_set_bitXX" correctly.
+ */
+ __atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_test_set, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&count32, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_32) {
+ printf("Failed to test and set on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&count64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_64) {
+ printf("Failed to test and set on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Launch all slave lcores to do "rte_bitops_test_and_clear_bitXX"
+ * respectively.
+ * Each lcore should have MAX_BITS_XX chances to check the target bit.
+ * If it's equal to 1, clear it to 0 and "countXX (which is initialized
+ * to 0)" would be increased by one. If the target bit is 0, still clear
+ * it to 0 and do nothing for "countXX". There would be only one lcore
+ * that finds the target bit is 1.
+ * If the final value of "countXX" is equal to MAX_BITS_XX, all slave
+ * lcores performed "rte_bitops_test_and_clear_bitXX" correctly.
+ */
+
+ __atomic_store_n(&count32, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&count64, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_bitops_test_clear, NULL, SKIP_MASTER);
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&count32, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_32) {
+ printf("Failed to test and clear on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&count64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) != MAX_BITS_64) {
+ printf("Failed to test and clear on multi cores.\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(bitops_autotest, test_bitops);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 141+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-15 7:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-18 9:00 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-16 7:54 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-18 9:02 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23 3:12 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-16 19:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-17 13:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-10-18 8:58 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23 3:07 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23 7:45 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-23 17:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-24 3:38 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-01 13:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-11-03 15:45 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-15 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-15 16:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-18 9:01 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Joyce Kong
2019-10-25 13:14 ` David Marchand
2019-10-29 16:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-30 9:55 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-30 10:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-30 12:32 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-30 13:02 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-31 10:39 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-10-23 3:09 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-23 4:56 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-23 7:46 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] test/iobitops: add io bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-10-23 3:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-10-23 2:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-11-19 9:22 ` Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-18 10:06 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-18 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bitoperation APIs Morten Brørup
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-20 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-12-02 6:09 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-02 9:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02 9:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bitoperation " Morten Brørup
2019-12-02 9:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-03 6:52 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] net/bnx2x: use common rte bit operation " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-11-28 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:55 ` Gavin Hu
2020-01-17 13:03 ` David Marchand
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of rte bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2019-12-20 6:52 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 16:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 18:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-23 5:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-23 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-30 3:02 ` Gavin Hu
2020-01-07 0:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-07 1:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-07 4:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-07 0:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-21 18:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-23 5:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-12-23 8:59 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2019-12-18 6:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] implement common rte bit operation APIs in PMDs Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of PMD bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-31 22:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-01 8:27 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-01 9:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-02 7:20 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-02 8:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-02 8:11 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-02 9:02 ` Gavin Hu
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] test/pmdbitops: add PMD bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2020-03-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/6] implement common bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of " Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 18:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of commonbit " Morten Brørup
2020-04-17 8:18 ` Joyce Kong
2020-04-17 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of common bit " Jerin Jacob
2020-04-20 2:46 ` Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-16 5:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/6] implement common bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of " Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 8:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26 2:07 ` Joyce Kong
2020-04-25 19:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26 7:18 ` Joyce Kong
2020-04-26 9:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-24 3:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/6] implement common bit operation APIs Joyce Kong
2020-06-16 12:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of " Joyce Kong
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/6] test/bitops: add bit operation test case Joyce Kong
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/6] net/axgbe: use common rte bit operation APIs instead Joyce Kong
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/6] net/bnx2x: " Joyce Kong
2024-02-17 12:01 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-17 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/6] net/qede: " Joyce Kong
2020-04-27 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/6] net/hinic: " Joyce Kong
2020-06-16 12:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1574071619-10407-3-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ravi1.kumar@amd.com \
--cc=rmody@marvell.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=xuanziyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=zhouguoyang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).