From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Yu, Jin" <jin.yu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
Lin Li <lilin24@baidu.com>, Xun Ni <nixun@baidu.com>,
Yu Zhang <zhangyu31@baidu.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/10] vhost: checkout and cleanup the resubmit inflight information
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:43:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32ea439d-cc3d-9dc1-7a01-b074993c26c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B9FBC361811A3D4DBB02350807E29F7B0B957A83@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 9/11/19 4:50 AM, Yu, Jin wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 6:21 PM
>> To: Yu, Jin <jin.yu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei
>> <tiwei.bie@intel.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; Lin Li
>> <lilin24@baidu.com>; Xun Ni <nixun@baidu.com>; Yu Zhang
>> <zhangyu31@baidu.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] vhost: checkout and cleanup the resubmit inflight
>> information
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/29/19 4:12 PM, JinYu wrote:
>>> This patch shows how to checkout the inflight ring and construct the
>>> resubmit information also include destroying resubmit info.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lin Li <lilin24@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xun Ni <nixun@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <zhangyu31@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yu <jin.yu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h | 19 ++++
>>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c | 29 ++++-
>>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 9 ++
>>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 197
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> ...
>>> +static int
>>> +vhost_check_queue_inflights_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>> +{
>>> + uint16_t i = 0;
>>> + uint16_t resubmit_num = 0, old_used_idx, num;
>>> + struct rte_vhost_resubmit_info *resubmit = NULL;
>>> + struct inflight_info_packed *inflight_packed;
>>> +
>>> + if (!(dev->protocol_features &
>>> + (1ULL << VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_INFLIGHT_SHMFD)))
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> +
>>> + if (!vq->inflight_packed->version) {
>>> + vq->inflight_packed->version = INFLIGHT_VERSION;
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((!vq->inflight_packed))
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>
>> It needs to be checked before before being dereferenced.
> Sorry I don't understand, you means I should check the vq pointer?
No, I meant vq->inflight_packed should be checked earlier, before
if (!vq->inflight_packed->version) {
>>> +
>>> + inflight_packed = vq->inflight_packed;
>>> + vq->resubmit_inflight = NULL;
>>> + vq->global_counter = 0;
>>> + old_used_idx = inflight_packed->old_used_idx;
>>> +
>>> + if (inflight_packed->used_idx != old_used_idx) {
>>> + if (inflight_packed->desc[old_used_idx].inflight == 0) {
>>> + inflight_packed->old_used_idx =
>>> + inflight_packed->used_idx;
>>> + inflight_packed->old_used_wrap_counter =
>>> + inflight_packed->used_wrap_counter;
>>> + inflight_packed->old_free_head =
>>> + inflight_packed->free_head;
>>> + } else {
>>> + inflight_packed->used_idx =
>>> + inflight_packed->old_used_idx;
>>> + inflight_packed->used_wrap_counter =
>>> + inflight_packed->old_used_wrap_counter;
>>> + inflight_packed->free_head =
>>> + inflight_packed->old_free_head;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < inflight_packed->desc_num; i++) {
>>> + if (inflight_packed->desc[i].inflight == 1)
>>> + resubmit_num++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (resubmit_num) {
>>> + resubmit = calloc(1, sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_info));
>>> + if (resubmit == NULL) {
>>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>>> + "Failed to allocate memory for resubmit info.\n");
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + resubmit->resubmit_list = calloc(resubmit_num,
>>> + sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_desc));
>>> + if (resubmit->resubmit_list == NULL) {
>>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>>> + "Failed to allocate memory for resubmit desc.\n");
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + num = 0;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < inflight_packed->desc_num; i++) {
>>> + if (vq->inflight_packed->desc[i].inflight == 1) {
>>> + resubmit->resubmit_list[num].index = i;
>>> + resubmit->resubmit_list[num].counter =
>>> + inflight_packed->desc[i].counter;
>>> + num++;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + resubmit->resubmit_num = num;
>>> +
>>> + if (resubmit->resubmit_num > 1)
>>> + qsort(resubmit->resubmit_list, resubmit-
>>> resubmit_num,
>>> + sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_desc),
>>> + resubmit_desc_compare);
>>> +
>>> + vq->global_counter = resubmit->resubmit_list[0].counter + 1;
>>> + vq->resubmit_inflight = resubmit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190806182500.22320>
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/10] vhost: support inflight share memory protocol feature JinYu
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/10] vhost: add the inflight description JinYu
2019-09-06 16:37 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/10] vhost: add packed ring JinYu
2019-09-06 16:42 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/10] vhost: add the inflight structure JinYu
2019-09-06 16:45 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-09 3:04 ` Yu, Jin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/10] vhost: add two new messages to support a shared buffer JinYu
2019-09-06 17:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-09 3:06 ` Yu, Jin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/10] vhost: checkout and cleanup the resubmit inflight information JinYu
2019-09-09 10:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-11 2:50 ` Yu, Jin
2019-09-11 8:43 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2019-09-11 9:07 ` Yu, Jin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/10] vhost: add the APIs to operate inflight ring JinYu
2019-09-11 13:19 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-09-12 9:26 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-16 1:21 ` Yu, Jin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/10] vhost: add APIs for user getting " JinYu
2019-09-12 9:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-16 1:20 ` Yu, Jin
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/10] vhost: fix vring functions to support packed ring JinYu
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/10] vhost: add an API for judging vq format JinYu
2019-08-29 14:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/10] vhost: add vhost-user-blk example which support inflight JinYu
2019-08-30 6:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/10] vhost: support inflight share memory protocol feature Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 16:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-09 4:51 ` Yu, Jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32ea439d-cc3d-9dc1-7a01-b074993c26c6@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jin.yu@intel.com \
--cc=lilin24@baidu.com \
--cc=nixun@baidu.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhangyu31@baidu.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).