dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, sudeep.dutt@intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/print: introduce new struct drm_device based WARN* macros
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:13:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121091306.GA29647@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87muahfbjt.fsf@intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Add new struct drm_device based WARN* macros. These are modeled after
> >> the core kernel device based WARN* macros. These would be preferred
> >> over the regular WARN* macros, where possible.
> >>
> >> These macros include device information in the backtrace, so we know
> >> what device the warnings originate from.
> >>
> >> Knowing the device specific information in the backtrace would be
> >> helpful in development all around.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> All, I'd really appreciate acks or reviews on this one to unblock the
> rest. I think the patch is fine, but I'd like wider approval before
> merging.

Patch looks good:

Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

	Sam
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15  3:44 [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/10] drm: Introduce struct drm_device based WARN* and use them in i915 Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/print: introduce new struct drm_device based WARN* macros Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15 10:02   ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-21  8:39     ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-21  9:13       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2020-01-22 13:30   ` [Intel-gfx] [ " Sean Paul
2020-01-22 15:32     ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915/display: Make WARN* drm specific where drm_device ptr is available Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/display: Make WARN* drm specific where drm_priv " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/i915/display: Make WARN* drm specific where encoder " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gem: Make WARN* drm specific where drm_priv " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/gt: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/gvt: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/i915/gvt: Make WARN* drm specific where vgpu " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/i915: Make WARN* drm specific where drm_priv " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:44 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/i915: Make WARN* drm specific where uncore or stream " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-22 16:22 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/10] drm: Introduce struct drm_device based WARN* and use them in i915 Jani Nikula
2020-01-23  9:00   ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-01-23  9:39     ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-27  8:14       ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-01-27  9:01         ` Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-15  3:43 Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-01-15  3:43 ` [[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/print: introduce new struct drm_device based WARN* macros Pankaj Bharadiya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200121091306.GA29647@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
    --cc=sudeep.dutt@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).