From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6141C43217 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3EA10E18F; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E6910E18F; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NH9zL6L79z4xGW; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:22:54 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1669184575; bh=EQ20pup+UOSYnYaiLUfl3RnsWjq+/RodS36tFIhcfGs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NliPke1t23bnfQJAAa1os0c3H2ibbVuYTIBW8ZiLF4Z7acOX3l8kmrxZJT8BesejB UH0ExfFNmGEpOland5zohsBckxbYl5zsleZQc3x6OdMvUYFECawpVudnty9XJR2lvc KQoe13e9Wm97Z23WtgSp9kOj2NdI67HLDnCOuSenxlTGBzXg2UzEObVfcfw0YYud5I 99muLLB8nR6ph5CcrJPVoaoYnXjeM4TaTzkZOS73v6muKJxi+QinV29BAPXtogMedH 8wPxYQeAk7GX2HXgxu1VYxl692khoIR/xlMCrhfk4EyvAufjypFxthBnmjYnbcW9Xd Dtf1xPsIghSWw== Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:22:53 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: David Airlie Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree Message-ID: <20221123172253.05c9b2f8@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20221117183214.2473e745@canb.auug.org.au> <20221123162033.02910a5a@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/l7LvT=tFQ83SWzFWhsDvPpv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Linux Next Mailing List , Thomas Zimmermann Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" --Sig_/l7LvT=tFQ83SWzFWhsDvPpv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:35:50 +1000 David Airlie wrote: > > Nothing gone wrong as such, just the drm-misc-next pull request was > sent on a regular weekly cadence, then I merged it a few days later. > The fix for this is still in the drm-misc-next queue for the next PR > which I will get this week. There is nothing currently in the drm-misc tree in linux-next (relative to the drm tree). And there was never a fix in there for this problem, the commit was just removed when I reported it. If there was a fix for this in the drm-misc tree, I would not have seen the build failure. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/l7LvT=tFQ83SWzFWhsDvPpv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmN9vD0ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwGXgf/QjhenVIKSMNwPEN7XNJTj8cqU9aDjBtnnjA/rsrdgzPTtJ/OgvPIUj8g TE6/aAGVh5IZKlliObO0zlfx5TJcuhPGz8rOotLW36ecvcLF4dHNuxlpcjYq3f+f 20OtftvBX37Oo9pzmEP5iH+wIUCkbnVQ+s4hiEzaV/TlqGrTt/D2tEjkZ4YNieQk bCP/i+XZjMah2B3EoTS9uwuyq9GsM9nGj3EMjiGfIuKIVSW1kAlo0H3JNhY33S2e zrp/MSGxPjmcaWVAEZ5/klA6yRcpqtxFE5Nz8519gXFtzyh1RjGBkCRO0xmnJHmy 9QbQKtB5vwW5MfL8/p3r7LADRZJ3/w== =4o2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/l7LvT=tFQ83SWzFWhsDvPpv--