From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström (VMware)" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: TTM or vmwgfx tree? Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix pte insertion with customized protection
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:54:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52254ee1-6a83-d1f1-1de8-9d94fc5798df@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01560aef-b21e-57b9-a7a1-fd7ff3aabfb2@shipmail.org>
Am 15.01.20 um 13:45 schrieb Thomas Hellström (VMware):
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 1/15/20 1:41 PM, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
>> From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
>>
>> The drm/ttm module is using a modified on-stack copy of the
>> struct vm_area_struct to be able to set a page protection with
>> customized
>> caching. Fix that by adding a vmf_insert_mixed_prot() function similar
>> to the existing vmf_insert_pfn_prot() for use with drm/ttm.
>>
>> Patches are acked to be merged through a drm tree.
>
> This small patchset should be ready to be merged now, with acks from
> Andrew.
>
> Do you want to take it through the ttm tree, or should I ask Dave /
> Daniel to pull it separately?
>
> Note that similar to the vmwgfx coherent patches, Linus has indicated
> that he wants separate pull requests for stuff like this that touches mm.
Better ask Dave in this case or merge through drm-misc-next. The later
is where I push all those little cross driver cleanup patches recently
and that seems to work fine.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 12:41 [PATCH v5 0/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix pte insertion with customized protection Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-01-15 12:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: Add a vmf_insert_mixed_prot() function Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-01-15 12:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix vm page protection handling Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-01-15 12:45 ` TTM or vmwgfx tree? Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix pte insertion with customized protection Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-01-15 12:54 ` Christian König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52254ee1-6a83-d1f1-1de8-9d94fc5798df@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).