From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
To: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] drm/mediatek: enable dither function
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:59:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJMQK-hqkcY05QmNT5Kk3MiaV5Lg3uGnDZFt2-_4rhf5tQ54gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611906124.1947.22.camel@mhfsdcap03>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:42 PM Yongqiang Niu
<yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:46 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:30 PM Yongqiang Niu
> > <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:24 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:33 AM CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, Hsin-Yi:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:23 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > > > > > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for 5 or 6 bpc panel, we need enable dither function
> > > > > > to improve the display quality
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > > index ac2cb25620357..6c8f246380a74 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > > > > > #define DITHER_EN BIT(0)
> > > > > > #define DISP_DITHER_CFG 0x0020
> > > > > > #define DITHER_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
> > > > > > +#define DITHER_ENGINE_EN BIT(1)
> > > > > > #define DISP_DITHER_SIZE 0x0030
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define LUT_10BIT_MASK 0x03ff
> > > > > > @@ -314,9 +315,19 @@ static void mtk_dither_config(struct device *dev, unsigned int w,
> > > > > > unsigned int bpc, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct mtk_ddp_comp_dev *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > > + bool enable = (bpc == 5 || bpc == 6);
> > > > >
> > > > > I strongly believe that dither function in dither is identical to the
> > > > > one in gamma and od, and in mtk_dither_set_common(), 'bpc >=
> > > > > MTK_MIN_BPC' is valid, so I believe we need not to limit bpc to 5 or 6.
> > > > > But we should consider the case that bpc is invalid in
> > > > > mtk_dither_set_common(). Invalid case in gamma and od use different way
> > > > > to process. For gamma, dither is default relay mode, so invalid bpc
> > > > > would do nothing in mtk_dither_set_common() and result in relay mode.
> > > > > For od, it set to relay mode first, them invalid bpc would do nothing in
> > > > > mtk_dither_set_common() and result in relay mode. I would like dither,
> > > > > gamma and od to process invalid bpc in the same way. One solution is to
> > > > > set relay mode in mtk_dither_set_common() for invalid bpc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > CK
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I modify the mtk_dither_config() to follow:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > index ac2cb25620357..5b7fcedb9f9a8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > > > #define DITHER_EN BIT(0)
> > > > #define DISP_DITHER_CFG 0x0020
> > > > #define DITHER_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
> > > > +#define DITHER_ENGINE_EN BIT(1)
> > > > #define DISP_DITHER_SIZE 0x0030
> > > >
> > > > #define LUT_10BIT_MASK 0x03ff
> > > > @@ -166,6 +167,8 @@ void mtk_dither_set_common(void __iomem *regs,
> > > > struct cmdq_client_reg *cmdq_reg,
> > > > DITHER_ADD_LSHIFT_G(MTK_MAX_BPC - bpc),
> > > > cmdq_reg, regs, DISP_DITHER_16);
> > > > mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, dither_en, cmdq_reg, regs, cfg);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, cmdq_reg, regs, cfg);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -315,8 +318,12 @@ static void mtk_dither_config(struct device *dev,
> > > > unsigned int w,
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_ddp_comp_dev *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > >
> > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > > priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > > priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > > + DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > > + DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > + mtk_dither_set_common(priv->regs, &priv->cmdq_reg, bpc, DISP_DITHER_CFG,
> > > > + DITHER_ENGINE_EN, cmdq_pkt);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > So now, not only bpc==5 or 6, but all valid bpc, dither config will
> > > > call mtk_dither_set_common() with the flag DITHER_ENGINE_EN(BIT(1)).
> > > > od config will call mtk_dither_set_common() with the flag
> > > > DISP_DITHERING(BIT(2)).
> > > > Additionally for 8173, gamma config will call mtk_dither_set_common()
> > > > with the flag DISP_DITHERING (BIT(2))
> > > >
> > > > For invalid mode all of them will be DITHER_RELAY_MODE.
> > > >
> > > > Just to make sure that this follows the spec? thanks
> > > >
> > >
> > > for mt8173 gamma, there is no relay mode, only dither enable or not(bit
> > > 2).
> > > for mt8183 dither, there is dither enable bit 1, and relay mode bit 0
> > >
> > CK suggested to set relay mode for invalid cases. Or should I just set
> > invalid case in mtk_dither_config()? So that invalid case for gamma
> > and od would remain its default mode?
> >
> od and gamma has no relay mode
> set relay mode in mtk_dither_config is better
>
>
> > Besides that, the major difference of this patch and original version
> > is that not only bpc ==5 or 6 will set dither enable bit 1. Does this
> > looks good to you?
>
> dither only support bpc 4 6 8 , there is no bpc 5 use case,
> please modify this error.
>
Only bpc 4, 6, 8 case will call mtk_dither_set_common, other bpc will
be considered invalid and stays in relay mode.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
index ac2cb25620357..5761dd15eedf2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#define DITHER_EN BIT(0)
#define DISP_DITHER_CFG 0x0020
#define DITHER_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
+#define DITHER_ENGINE_EN BIT(1)
#define DISP_DITHER_SIZE 0x0030
#define LUT_10BIT_MASK 0x03ff
@@ -314,9 +315,17 @@ static void mtk_dither_config(struct device *dev,
unsigned int w,
unsigned int bpc, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
{
struct mtk_ddp_comp_dev *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
- mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg,
priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
- mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
+ bool valid_bpc = (bpc == 4 || bpc == 6 || bpc == 8);
+
+ mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
+ DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
+ if (valid_bpc)
+ mtk_dither_set_common(priv->regs, &priv->cmdq_reg, bpc,
+ DISP_DITHER_CFG, DITHER_ENGINE_EN,
+ cmdq_pkt);
+ else
+ mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
+ priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
}
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > > > + if (enable) {
> > > > > > + mtk_dither_set_common(priv->regs, &priv->cmdq_reg, bpc,
> > > > > > + DISP_DITHER_CFG, DITHER_ENGINE_EN,
> > > > > > + cmdq_pkt);
> > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > > > > + priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > > > > + DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static void mtk_dither_start(struct device *dev)
> > > > >
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 11:23 [PATCH v12 0/8] drm/mediatek: add support for mediatek SOC MT8183 Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] arm64: dts: mt8183: rename rdma fifo size Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 16:31 ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] arm64: dts: mt8183: refine gamma compatible name Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 16:33 ` Matthias Brugger
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] drm/mediatek: add mtk_dither_set_common() function Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] drm/mediatek: separate gamma module Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] drm/mediatek: add has_dither private data for gamma Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] drm/mediatek: enable dither function Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-29 1:33 ` CK Hu
2021-01-29 6:24 ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-29 6:30 ` Yongqiang Niu
2021-01-29 6:46 ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-29 7:42 ` Yongqiang Niu
2021-01-29 7:59 ` Hsin-Yi Wang [this message]
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] soc: mediatek: add mtk mutex support for MT8183 Hsin-Yi Wang
2021-01-29 1:11 ` CK Hu
2021-01-28 11:23 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] drm/mediatek: add support for mediatek SOC MT8183 Hsin-Yi Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJMQK-hqkcY05QmNT5Kk3MiaV5Lg3uGnDZFt2-_4rhf5tQ54gg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).