From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v3)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:26:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOFGe96wvRvxKMczMwfJL7naQZs1tp9owj7xte9+0QnhxVEhag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1561dbe-a109-9a1d-df1d-bf91fd67e3f6@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:49 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/04/2021 23:31, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > This API is entirely unnecessary and I'd love to get rid of it. If
> > userspace wants a single timeline across multiple contexts, they can
> > either use implicit synchronization or a syncobj, both of which existed
> > at the time this feature landed. The justification given at the time
> > was that it would help GL drivers which are inherently single-timeline.
> > However, neither of our GL drivers actually wanted the feature. i965
> > was already in maintenance mode at the time and iris uses syncobj for
> > everything.
> >
> > Unfortunately, as much as I'd love to get rid of it, it is used by the
> > media driver so we can't do that. We can, however, do the next-best
> > thing which is to embed a syncobj in the context and do exactly what
> > we'd expect from userspace internally. This isn't an entirely identical
> > implementation because it's no longer atomic if userspace races with
> > itself by calling execbuffer2 twice simultaneously from different
> > threads. It won't crash in that case; it just doesn't guarantee any
> > ordering between those two submits.
>
> 1)
>
> Please also mention the difference in context/timeline name when
> observed via the sync file API.
>
> 2)
>
> I don't remember what we have concluded in terms of observable effects
> in sync_file_merge?
I don't see how either of these are observable since this syncobj is
never exposed to userspace in any way. Please help me understand what
I'm missing here.
--Jason
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> > Moving SINGLE_TIMELINE to a syncobj emulation has a couple of technical
> > advantages beyond mere annoyance. One is that intel_timeline is no
> > longer an api-visible object and can remain entirely an implementation
> > detail. This may be advantageous as we make scheduler changes going
> > forward. Second is that, together with deleting the CLONE_CONTEXT API,
> > we should now have a 1:1 mapping between intel_context and
> > intel_timeline which may help us reduce locking.
> >
> > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > - Update the comment on i915_gem_context::syncobj to mention that it's
> > an emulation and the possible race if userspace calls execbuffer2
> > twice on the same context concurrently.
> > - Wrap the checks for eb.gem_context->syncobj in unlikely()
> > - Drop the dma_fence reference
> > - Improved commit message
> >
> > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > - Move the dma_fence_put() to before the error exit
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 49 +++++--------------
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 14 +++++-
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 16 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > index 2c2fefa912805..a72c9b256723b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
> > #include <linux/log2.h>
> > #include <linux/nospec.h>
> >
> > +#include <drm/drm_syncobj.h>
> > +
> > #include "gt/gen6_ppgtt.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_context.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_context_param.h"
> > @@ -225,10 +227,6 @@ static void intel_context_set_gem(struct intel_context *ce,
> > ce->vm = vm;
> > }
> >
> > - GEM_BUG_ON(ce->timeline);
> > - if (ctx->timeline)
> > - ce->timeline = intel_timeline_get(ctx->timeline);
> > -
> > if (ctx->sched.priority >= I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL &&
> > intel_engine_has_timeslices(ce->engine))
> > __set_bit(CONTEXT_USE_SEMAPHORES, &ce->flags);
> > @@ -351,9 +349,6 @@ void i915_gem_context_release(struct kref *ref)
> > mutex_destroy(&ctx->engines_mutex);
> > mutex_destroy(&ctx->lut_mutex);
> >
> > - if (ctx->timeline)
> > - intel_timeline_put(ctx->timeline);
> > -
> > put_pid(ctx->pid);
> > mutex_destroy(&ctx->mutex);
> >
> > @@ -570,6 +565,9 @@ static void context_close(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> > if (vm)
> > i915_vm_close(vm);
> >
> > + if (ctx->syncobj)
> > + drm_syncobj_put(ctx->syncobj);
> > +
> > ctx->file_priv = ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -765,33 +763,11 @@ static void __assign_ppgtt(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> > i915_vm_close(vm);
> > }
> >
> > -static void __set_timeline(struct intel_timeline **dst,
> > - struct intel_timeline *src)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_timeline *old = *dst;
> > -
> > - *dst = src ? intel_timeline_get(src) : NULL;
> > -
> > - if (old)
> > - intel_timeline_put(old);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void __apply_timeline(struct intel_context *ce, void *timeline)
> > -{
> > - __set_timeline(&ce->timeline, timeline);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void __assign_timeline(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> > - struct intel_timeline *timeline)
> > -{
> > - __set_timeline(&ctx->timeline, timeline);
> > - context_apply_all(ctx, __apply_timeline, timeline);
> > -}
> > -
> > static struct i915_gem_context *
> > i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE &&
> > !HAS_EXECLISTS(i915))
> > @@ -820,16 +796,13 @@ i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> > }
> >
> > if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) {
> > - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> > -
> > - timeline = intel_timeline_create(&i915->gt);
> > - if (IS_ERR(timeline)) {
> > + ret = drm_syncobj_create(&ctx->syncobj,
> > + DRM_SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED,
> > + NULL);
> > + if (ret) {
> > context_close(ctx);
> > - return ERR_CAST(timeline);
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > }
> > -
> > - __assign_timeline(ctx, timeline);
> > - intel_timeline_put(timeline);
> > }
> >
> > trace_i915_context_create(ctx);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > index 676592e27e7d2..df76767f0c41b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > @@ -83,7 +83,19 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
> > struct i915_gem_engines __rcu *engines;
> > struct mutex engines_mutex; /* guards writes to engines */
> >
> > - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> > + /**
> > + * @syncobj: Shared timeline syncobj
> > + *
> > + * When the SHARED_TIMELINE flag is set on context creation, we
> > + * emulate a single timeline across all engines using this syncobj.
> > + * For every execbuffer2 call, this syncobj is used as both an in-
> > + * and out-fence. Unlike the real intel_timeline, this doesn't
> > + * provide perfect atomic in-order guarantees if the client races
> > + * with itself by calling execbuffer2 twice concurrently. However,
> > + * if userspace races with itself, that's not likely to yield well-
> > + * defined results anyway so we choose to not care.
> > + */
> > + struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
> >
> > /**
> > * @vm: unique address space (GTT)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > index b812f313422a9..d640bba6ad9ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > @@ -3460,6 +3460,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> > goto err_vma;
> > }
> >
> > + if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> > + struct dma_fence *fence;
> > +
> > + fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(eb.gem_context->syncobj);
> > + err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb.request, fence);
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_ext;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (in_fence) {
> > if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_FENCE_SUBMIT)
> > err = i915_request_await_execution(eb.request,
> > @@ -3517,6 +3527,12 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> > fput(out_fence->file);
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> > + drm_syncobj_replace_fence(eb.gem_context->syncobj,
> > + &eb.request->fence);
> > + }
> > +
> > i915_request_put(eb.request);
> >
> > err_vma:
> >
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 22:31 [PATCH 00/21] drm/i915/gem: ioctl clean-ups Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 01/21] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_RINGSIZE Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 3:33 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915/gem: Set the watchdog timeout directly in intel_context_set_gem Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-28 17:24 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 8:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-29 14:54 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 17:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 18:41 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-30 11:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-30 15:35 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915/gem: Return void from context_apply_all Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: Drop the CONTEXT_CLONE API Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 17:38 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 15:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v3) Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 15:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-28 17:26 ` Jason Ekstrand [this message]
2021-04-29 8:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-29 12:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 14:47 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915: Drop getparam support for I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 9:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915/gem: Disallow bonding of virtual engines Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-26 23:43 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915/gem: Disallow bonding of virtual engines (v2) Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-27 13:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-27 13:51 ` [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915/gem: Disallow bonding of virtual engines Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 10:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 17:18 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 17:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-04-28 17:46 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 17:55 ` Matthew Brost
2021-04-28 18:17 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 12:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-30 4:03 ` Matthew Brost
2021-04-30 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-01 17:17 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-04 7:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 18:58 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 12:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 16:02 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 15:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-29 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 12:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-29 15:41 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915/gem: Disallow creating contexts with too many engines Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 10:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 10:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-28 14:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 14:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-28 17:09 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 8:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-29 19:16 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-30 11:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-30 15:54 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 10/21] drm/i915/request: Remove the hook from await_execution Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-26 23:44 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: Stop manually RCU banging in reset_stats_ioctl Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-28 18:22 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 12:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 12/21] drm/i915/gem: Add a separate validate_priority helper Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-28 14:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 13/21] drm/i915/gem: Add an intermediate proto_context struct Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 13:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 16:44 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 14/21] drm/i915/gem: Return an error ptr from context_lookup Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 15:29 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915/gt: Drop i915_address_space::file Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 15:26 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 16/21] drm/i915/gem: Delay context creation Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-24 3:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-04-24 3:24 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-29 15:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 18:16 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 18:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 19:01 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-29 21:35 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-30 6:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-30 11:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-30 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-30 12:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-30 13:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-30 13:15 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-30 16:27 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-30 16:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-30 16:57 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-30 17:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915/gem: Don't allow changing the VM on running contexts Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 18/21] drm/i915/gem: Don't allow changing the engine set " Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915/selftests: Take a VM in kernel_context() Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 20/21] i915/gem/selftests: Assign the VM at context creation in igt_shared_ctx_exec Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915/gem: Roll all of context creation together Jason Ekstrand
2021-04-29 17:25 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOFGe96wvRvxKMczMwfJL7naQZs1tp9owj7xte9+0QnhxVEhag@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jason@jlekstrand.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).