From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] generic/223: Don't clear all mkfs options for _scratch_mkfs_geom() roughly
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:07:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715160729.GM7600@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5F0E7424.2090709@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:12:36AM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
> On 2020/7/15 10:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 05:40:05PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
> > > ext4 can accept the last one if the same mkfs options are passed but xfs cannot
> > I'm having trouble parsing this commit message. What does 'last one' refer to?
> >
> > > accept the same mkfs options and reports "xxx option is respecified" error.
> > Ok I think I understand now. Some FS's (XFS) do not accept an option more than
> > once. So we can't just blindly add options to the end of the MKFS_OPTIONS. Is
> > that correct?
> Hi Ira,
>
> Correct.
> > > I
> > > prefer to override the same mkfs option which is defined in MKFS_OPTION so that
> > > we can have a chance to pass other mkfs options to _scratch_mkfs_geom().
> > Instead the patch parses the current option string and replaces the value if
> > the option is already there. This allows us to specify MKFS_OPTIONS to
> > generic/223.
> Right. :-)
>
> XFS_MKFS_OPTIONS/MKFS_OPTIONS can be used to specify some custom options by user,
> so I don't want to clear it blindly.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiao Yang
> > I think the code is reasonable although my sed skills are not good enough to
> > tell for sure... ;-)
> >
> > Ira
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > ---
> > > common/rc | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > > tests/generic/223 | 1 -
> > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > index 6c908f2e..567cf83b 100644
> > > --- a/common/rc
> > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > @@ -1051,7 +1051,19 @@ _scratch_mkfs_geom()
> > >
> > > case $FSTYP in
> > > xfs)
> > > - MKFS_OPTIONS+=" -b size=$blocksize, -d su=$sunit_bytes,sw=$swidth_mult"
> > > + if echo "$MKFS_OPTIONS" | egrep -q "b?size="; then
> > > + MKFS_OPTIONS=$(echo "$MKFS_OPTIONS" | sed -r "s/(b?size=)[0-9]+/\1$blocksize/")
> > > + else
> > > + MKFS_OPTIONS+=" -b size=$blocksize"
> > > + fi
> > > +
> > > + if echo "$MKFS_OPTIONS" | egrep -q "(su|sunit|sw|swidth)="; then
> > > + MKFS_OPTIONS=$(echo "$MKFS_OPTIONS" | sed -r \
> > > + -e "s/(su|sunit)=[0-9kmg]+/su=$sunit_bytes/" \
> > > + -e "s/(sw|swidth)=[0-9kmg]+/sw=$swidth_mult/")
> > > + else
> > > + MKFS_OPTIONS+=" -d su=$sunit_bytes,sw=$swidth_mult"
> > > + fi
...ok, I see, this makes the function smart enough to substitute
geometry parameters instead of dumping them on the end and letting that
blow up. Heh, ok, that's definitely a weird quirk I've noticed.
> > > ;;
> > > ext4|ext4dev)
> > > MKFS_OPTIONS+=" -b $blocksize -E stride=$sunit_blocks,stripe_width=$swidth_blocks"
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/223 b/tests/generic/223
> > > index 6cfd00dd..ba7c9a44 100755
> > > --- a/tests/generic/223
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/223
> > > @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ for SUNIT_K in 8 16 32 64 128; do
> > > let SUNIT_BLOCKS=$SUNIT_BYTES/$BLOCKSIZE
> > >
> > > echo "=== mkfs with su $SUNIT_BLOCKS blocks x 4 ==="
> > > - export MKFS_OPTIONS=""
So I guess you're deleting this so that the test runs with whatever
MKFS_OPTIONS the test runner specified, while letting the test edit
blocksize and stripe parameters?
Proving I'm still bad at remembering to read commit messages,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> > > _scratch_mkfs_geom $SUNIT_BYTES 4 $BLOCKSIZE>> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > _scratch_mount
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 9:40 [PATCH v6 0/7] Make fstests support new behavior of DAX Xiao Yang
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] common/rc: Introduce new helpers for DAX mount options and FS_XFLAG_DAX Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 1:59 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-15 3:19 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 4:15 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-15 5:55 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 18:00 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] fstests: Use _require_scratch_dax_mountopt() and _require_dax_iflag() Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] generic/223: Don't clear all mkfs options for _scratch_mkfs_geom() roughly Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 2:31 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-15 3:12 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:07 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-07-16 1:36 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] generic/413, xfs/260: Improve format operation for PMD fault testing Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs/260: Move and update xfs/260 Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] generic: Verify if statx() can qurey S_DAX flag on regular file correctly Xiao Yang
2020-07-14 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] generic: Verify the inheritance behavior of FS_XFLAG_DAX flag in various combinations Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 2:48 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-15 5:39 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 8:10 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:43 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 9:44 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 16:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 16:33 ` Xiao Yang
2020-07-15 18:18 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715160729.GM7600@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).