From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:45:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180817224539.GA4158@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kaP3GPZi_5vSCspgbim5VwsTMRa-fLYbjgECqsx9BTaeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:39:29PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > diff --git a/pack-bitmap.h b/pack-bitmap.h
> > index 4555907dee..02a60ce670 100644
> > --- a/pack-bitmap.h
> > +++ b/pack-bitmap.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ int rebuild_existing_bitmaps(struct bitmap_index *, struct packing_data *mapping
> > khash_sha1 *reused_bitmaps, int show_progress);
> > void free_bitmap_index(struct bitmap_index *);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * After a traversal has been performed on the bitmap_index, this can be
> > + * queried to see if a particular object was reachable from any of the
> > + * objects flagged as UNINTERESTING.
>
> If the traversal has not been performed, we pretend the
> object was not reachable?
If the traversal hasn't been performed, the results are not defined
(though I suspect yeah, it happens to say "no").
> Is this a good API design, as it can be used when you do not
> have done all preparations? similarly to prepare_bitmap_walk
> we could have
>
> if (!bitmap_git->result)
> BUG("failed to perform bitmap walk before querying");
That seems like a reasonable precaution.
> > +int bitmap_has_sha1_in_uninteresting(struct bitmap_index *, const unsigned char *sha1);
>
> You seem to have rebased it to master resolving conflicts only. ;-)
> Do we want to talk about object ids here instead?
See the discussion in the commit message.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 20:54 [PATCH 0/6] reuse on-disk deltas for fetches with bitmaps Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] t/perf: factor boilerplate out of test_perf Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] t/perf: factor out percent calculations Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] t/perf: add infrastructure for measuring sizes Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] t/perf: add perf tests for fetches from a bitmapped server Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk Jeff King
2018-08-17 22:39 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 22:45 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects Jeff King
2018-08-17 22:57 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 23:32 ` Jeff King
2018-08-20 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-20 21:42 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] reuse on-disk deltas for fetches with bitmaps Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:08 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 19:51 ` Jeff King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-21 18:41 [PATCH] test-tool.h: include git-compat-util.h Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:47 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-21 19:54 ` Jeff King
2018-08-31 15:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-31 22:55 ` Jeff King
2014-03-26 7:22 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] reuse deltas found by bitmaps Jeff King
2014-03-26 7:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180817224539.GA4158@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).