From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: teach --single-branch and --branch during --recurse
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:20:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200127222019.GA233139@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117210319.GA15460@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:03:19PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> (like trying to replace the use of "repo" in Android)
Oops, you saw right through us ;)
> It would make more sense to me to either (or both):
>
> - make sure that .gitmodules has enough information about which branch
> to use for each submodule
Hum. I don't work with them day to day, but aren't we already in that
state? Is that not what the 'branch' option for each submodule means?
>
> - offer an extra option for the default branch to use for any
> submodules. This is still not general enough to cover all situations
> (e.g., the bar/baz you showed above), but it at least makes it
> relatively easy to cover the simple cases, without breaking any
> existing ones.
Yeah, this is sort of the direction my mind went too - "not
--branch recursively, but --submodule-branch". But that breaks down when you've
got a nontrivial number of submodules, at which point you're gonna have
a hard time unless you've got the .gitmodules configured correctly.
Well, as for this patch, let me try it with just --single-branch and see
whether that works for the case the user reported. I can head back to
the drawing board if not.
- Emily
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-27 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 23:19 [PATCH] clone: teach --single-branch and --branch during --recurse Emily Shaffer
2020-01-08 23:39 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-01-09 8:11 ` Jeff King
2020-01-16 22:38 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-01-17 21:03 ` Jeff King
2020-01-27 22:20 ` Emily Shaffer [this message]
2020-01-27 22:49 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-01-27 23:10 ` Jeff King
2020-01-28 1:08 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-01-28 1:31 ` Jeff King
2020-01-28 2:10 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-01-27 23:00 ` Jeff King
2020-01-28 22:17 ` [PATCH v2] clone: pass --single-branch during --recurse-submodules Emily Shaffer
2020-01-30 10:23 ` Jeff King
2020-02-21 2:53 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-02-21 3:16 ` Jeff King
2020-02-21 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] propagate --single-branch during clone --recurse-submodules Emily Shaffer
2020-02-21 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] submodule--helper: use C99 named initializer Emily Shaffer
2020-02-21 5:26 ` Jeff King
2020-02-22 20:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-21 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] clone: pass --single-branch during --recurse-submodules Emily Shaffer
2020-02-21 5:28 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200127222019.GA233139@google.com \
--to=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).