From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E80C433E3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CEE20748 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="kfA5y9mR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727810AbgGJUaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:30:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43154 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727984AbgGJUaC (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9116C08C5DC for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id s26so3023619pfm.4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZHG/du3aU6BUlUwT8vqHIVCEHItjNtGW5X/phkZc74Y=; b=kfA5y9mRd0R7a83xffTUIYM+v76Z4kDZ0T3+Vd1Uf/iiQF3qmoLa8UgwqJtCW35n6/ FP4yck8aWElVm2R6WKETEldtrLVkQSxiRN0EQG+NHbnsluZA8Ghbzp1tLNJzUCxtDyUX QwTOwxhF7JHCD82GBhXXw5ti2dAAugcVHKyq45624pKvXcjxIOYGwP8W7xPdXh4vOGiv PM9rxDBOLZJIVA1VtbaiLCCaKhMCJ5EbLr6LxhPwcsHDk1xOIeSkRmYNo+PiyrlrHR6M lFEUMYQABdOMr00t1QnJjQJZFOfBxelig2voqnXo14TR2INe0F1jOOCR550HDM9UREvL Gt1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZHG/du3aU6BUlUwT8vqHIVCEHItjNtGW5X/phkZc74Y=; b=kTdFRsmhGBazH8FDt2MhhOoPdf3ZhZ02bTMV1dmOA9rlleGAvccfLLBGeYGxAFITul gZ0DHP7UYUMFtHIG6BCdpEMmK9L7aQRWDs4/jh7fG4D4V6w1tH4fThd4asshfEsjnyl2 zioLxxzerdMh2omQYBEA9nSo0R+3v2jHQ5djayEGmPmsg2AjNlpJf9vh3jl7IDvaRXJm R+OjO+mKGoPH0OkNUqAAfNirAuKgdBk1heLmSk6herEz3zXSpqI4BYmsuRmQPPpliQRo c2J4eI7oBQFo2RDInDNoxZcMo+Eyrx0JlgirW7gwAPBA5I/dKukRRpBjJHwzkBDPwcHd zTdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WPL9aA5XA7fCOzk6shdcJmU0vhhEpQtK2NgBjJdmd7EeGgQYy /JjC34S3OIVfOjKhd3Av7n52W281qm8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzfic44WrPi+eO8yvu0eumgL/Fiw10at6WTK36/oEu8PtC4bFrjekLA7pNuT8xb1ZBRVBLTA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:63d4:: with SMTP id n20mr62184106pgv.213.1594413000659; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2ce:0:1ea0:b8ff:fe77:f690]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e195sm6661397pfh.218.2020.07.10.13.29.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:29:55 -0700 From: Emily Shaffer To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] progress: remove redundant null-checking Message-ID: <20200710202955.GF3189386@google.com> References: <20200710014242.1088216-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20200710014242.1088216-3-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20200710022040.GB39052@syl.lan> <20200710192731.GE3189386@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:58:54PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Emily Shaffer writes: > > > Will it make your life easier if I base this series on the other topic? > > Or would you rather I leave it to you? > > Either is fine. > > Just don't expect any quick turnaround time for a new and involved > change like this while we are entering the pre-release freeze. We > are supposed to be stablizing, not churning ;-). Understood. It's got a nit or two from Stolee's review so I need to reroll it anyway; I'll send it based on the other topic. - Emily