From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: jonathantanmy@google.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] fetch-pack: buffer object-format with other args
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:24:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409162417.2558134-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy2dsnjuf.fsf@gitster.g>
> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
>
> > In send_fetch_request(), "object-format" is written directly to the file
> > descriptor, as opposed to the other arguments, which are buffered.
> > Buffer "object-format" as well. "object-format" must be buffered; in
> > particular, it must appear after "command=fetch" in the request.
> >
> > This divergence was introduced in 4b831208bb ("fetch-pack: parse and
> > advertise the object-format capability", 2020-05-27), perhaps as an
> > oversight (the surrounding code at the point of this commit has already
> > been using a request buffer.)
>
> Good find. Did this actually resulted in a data corruption and that
> was how you discovered it?
No, I did not see any data corruption. I discovered it because I was
looking at this function, thinking that I needed to refactor it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 1:09 [PATCH 0/6] Push negotiation Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 1:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] fetch-pack: buffer object-format with other args Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 4:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-09 16:24 ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2021-04-09 1:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] fetch-pack: refactor process_acks() Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 5:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-03 16:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-04-09 1:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] fetch-pack: refactor add_haves() Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 5:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-09 1:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] fetch-pack: refactor command and capability write Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 5:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-09 1:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] fetch: teach independent negotiation (no packfile) Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 5:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-09 16:38 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-03 15:25 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-03 15:40 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-03 21:52 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-09 1:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] send-pack: support push negotiation Jonathan Tan
2021-05-03 15:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-03 22:02 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-05-04 17:26 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-04-30 5:42 ` [PATCH 0/6] Push negotiation Junio C Hamano
2021-04-30 17:33 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Jonathan Tan
2021-05-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fetch-pack: refactor process_acks() Jonathan Tan
2021-05-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fetch-pack: refactor add_haves() Jonathan Tan
2021-05-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fetch-pack: refactor command and capability write Jonathan Tan
2021-05-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fetch: teach independent negotiation (no packfile) Jonathan Tan
2021-05-05 1:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-05 16:42 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-06 2:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-05 16:44 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] send-pack: support push negotiation Jonathan Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210409162417.2558134-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
--to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).