git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, chriscool@tuxfamily.org,
	pranit.bauva@gmail.com, ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Trygve Aaberge <trygveaa@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] t6030: add test for git bisect skip started with --term* arguments
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:38:06 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428113805.109528-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> (raw)

Trygve Aaberge reported git bisect breakage when the bisection
is started with --term* arguments (--term-new and --term-old).

For example, suppose that we have repository with 10 commits, and we
start the bisection from HEAD to first commit (HEAD~9) with:

  $ git bisect start --term-new=fixed --term-old=unfixed HEAD HEAD~9

The bisection then stopped at HEAD~5 (fifth commit), and we choose
to skip (git bisect skip). The HEAD should now at HEAD~4 (sixth commit).
In the breakage, however, the HEAD after skipping stayed at HEAD~5
(not changed).

The breakage is caused by forgetting to read '.git/BISECT_TERMS' during
implementation of `'bisect skip' subcommand in C.

Let's add the test to catch the breakage. Now that the corresponding
fix had been integrated, flip the switch to test_expect_success.

Reported-by: Trygve Aaberge <trygveaa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
---

 Changes from v2 [1]:
   * remove double quotes inside test name
   * double-quote HASH_SKIPPED_FROM and HASH_SKIPPED_TO in the
     test comparison line
   * rename test name to be simpler
   * commit message now includes proper explanation why git bisect skip
     is currently broken
   * because the fix to the breakage had just been landed on seen, flip
     the switch to test_expect_success.
   * give credit to Trygve in form of Reported-by

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210425080508.154159-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/

 t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index 32bb66e1ed..ca3a1de433 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -922,6 +922,17 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start takes options and revs in any order' '
 	test_cmp expected actual
 '
 
+# Bisect is started with --term-new and --term-old arguments,
+# then skip. The HEAD should be changed.
+test_expect_success 'bisect skip works with --term*' '
+	git bisect reset &&
+	git bisect start --term-new=fixed --term-old=unfixed HEAD $HASH1 &&
+	HASH_SKIPPED_FROM=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
+	git bisect skip &&
+	HASH_SKIPPED_TO=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
+	test "$HASH_SKIPPED_FROM" != "$HASH_SKIPPED_TO"
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'git bisect reset cleans bisection state properly' '
 	git bisect reset &&
 	git bisect start &&

base-commit: 311531c9de557d25ac087c1637818bd2aad6eb3a
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28 11:38 Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2021-04-28 16:55 ` [PATCH v3] t6030: add test for git bisect skip started with --term* arguments Eric Sunshine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210428113805.109528-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
    --cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
    --cc=trygveaa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).