git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add core.mode configuration
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:03:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525e100e45ee8_81a151de74ed@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015220125.GA14021@shrek.podlesie.net>

Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:51:41PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > 
> > I don't see what is the problem. We haven't had the need for push.default =
> > simplewarning, have we? If you want the warning, you don't change anything, if
> 
> simplewarning makes no sense, because push.default=simple sets exact
> behavior,

Exactly.

> not some "next" behavior that may change in future.

But I'm suggesting to add a core.addremove option as well, like you suggested,
am I not?

That option wouldn't change in the future.

> > you want to specify something, you already know what you are doing.
> > 
> > > Maybe we should also add core.mode=next-warn that changes defaults like next
> > > but keeps warnings enabled until the user accepts that change by setting
> > > appropriate config option?
> > 
> > Maybe, but would you actually use that option?
> 
> No.

So you would be happy if we had core.addremove = true *and* core.mode = next,
right? You would use one, different people with different needs would use the
other.

> > > That's safer than next (at least for interactive use) and maybe more users
> > > would use that, but I don't think that's worth adding.
> > 
> > Maybe, but I don't think many users would use either mode, and that's good.
> > 
> > > For me, old behavior by default and warnings with information how to
> > > enable new incompatible features, is sufficient. So I don't need
> > > core.mode option, but as long it will be useful for other users I have
> > > nothing against it.
> > 
> > OK, but that seems to mean you don't need core.mode = next-warn either. I'm not
> > against adding such a mode, but I would like to hear about _somebody_ that
> > would like to actually use it. I don't like to program for ghosts.
> >
> 
> As I said earlier, I don't think that next-warn it's worth adding, but
> such option might increase the number of people interested in the
> core.mode.

Well that's a hypothesis, and I would be interested in finding out if that's
true, but until I see somebody that says "I want core.mode = next-war", I'm
going to assume they are hypothetical.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-16  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-12  7:04 [PATCH v3] Add core.mode configuration Felipe Contreras
2013-10-14 20:59 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-14 21:35   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 12:35     ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 12:32       ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 13:33         ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 13:29           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 14:51             ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 16:59               ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16  3:55                 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16  7:09                   ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16 19:31                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 10:54                   ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16 15:11                     ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16 19:57                       ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 19:32                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 22:02                       ` Philip Oakley
2013-10-16 23:06                         ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-17 19:48                           ` Philip Oakley
2013-10-17 21:08                           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 18:51               ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 22:01                 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16  4:03                   ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2013-10-16  6:34                     ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16 19:28                       ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525e100e45ee8_81a151de74ed@nysa.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysiek@podlesie.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).