From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2021, #05; Mon, 19)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuo02gdd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YH9gPt410QBRjG59@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Wed, Apr 21 2021, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2021-04-20 at 13:52:33, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> This has a textual conflict (no longer a semantic one) with the above
>> ab/unexpected-object-type etc.
>>
>> As noted in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/git/87mttx121j.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ I had
>> questions about the approach in hash-object.c, in particular I have
>> POC/WIP patches that make one of brian's TODO tests pass, by doing the
>> "we are in SHA256 mode" earlier, which is also less code as we won't
>> need to add special handling to a large part of hash-object.c (or, in
>> the future, other such commands).
>
> I'm going to drop those first two patches for now, since I plan to
> implement them in a different way in the future.
Using something like the:
git --object-format=sha256 <cmd>
Approch I suggsted in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/8735vq2l8a.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ ?
In any case having something like the OPT_OBJECT_FORMAT() I added in
that WIP patch would make sense wouldn't it, to reduce the duplication
of current "object-format". It would also save each current caller from
doing the "unknown" and other sanity checks, since they could rely on
parse_options() having died in that case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 23:25 What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2021, #05; Mon, 19) Junio C Hamano
2021-04-20 13:23 ` Matheus Tavares Bernardino
2021-04-20 13:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-20 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-20 23:14 ` brian m. carlson
2021-04-21 8:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-04-21 22:32 ` brian m. carlson
2021-04-20 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-23 14:41 ` Jeff King
2021-04-20 14:28 ` Jeff Hostetler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tuo02gdd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=e@80x24.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).