From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GSOC] ref-filter: solve bugs caused by enumeration
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 13:09:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8RhVZQJX8z1gY5UM1jv0imZ4K9UnD14MgJFfvqBBiAZQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5yzvw3kk.fsf@gitster.g>
> If that is truly the concern (I do not know without measuring),
> perhaps we should add a member next to the union to say which one of
> the union members is valid, so that you can say
>
> if (atom->atom_type == ATOM_TYPE_REMOTE_REF &&
> atom->u.remote_ref.push)
>
> (introduce an enum and define ATOM_TYPE_* after the member in the
> union).
>
Yes, I think so. Since the content of this part needs to be modified for
the parsing of all atoms, I will put it in a separate topic to complete.
> That would help futureproofing the code even further, as a new
> synonym of "push" introduced laster [*] would not invalidate the check you are
> adding there.
>
Yes, this enhances its generalization ability.
>
> [Footnote]
>
> * remote_ref_atom_parser() in the future may begin like so:
>
> - if (!strcmp(atom->name, "push") || starts_with(atom->name, "push:"))
> + if (!strcmp(atom->name, "push") || starts_with(atom->name, "push:") ||
> + !strcmp(atom->name, "a-synonym-for-push"))
> atom->u.remote_ref.push = 1;
>
--
ZheNing Hu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 15:31 [PATCH] [GSOC] ref-filter: solve bugs caused by enumeration ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-06 1:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 5:02 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 5:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 10:39 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 11:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 11:52 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-07 4:32 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-07 4:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-07 5:09 ` ZheNing Hu [this message]
2021-05-06 16:31 ` [PATCH v2] [GSOC] ref-filter: fix read invalid union member bug ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-08 15:26 ` [PATCH v3] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-10 7:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-10 12:35 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-10 7:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-10 12:51 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-10 15:01 ` [PATCH v4] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-11 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 6:28 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 9:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 11:47 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 13:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 13:31 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 15:35 ` [PATCH v5] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-12 1:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-12 10:37 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-12 12:12 ` [PATCH v6] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-12 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-13 9:29 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-13 15:13 ` [PATCH v7] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOLTT8RhVZQJX8z1gY5UM1jv0imZ4K9UnD14MgJFfvqBBiAZQg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).