From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] worktree: generalize delete_git_dir() to reduce code duplication
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:45:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cR90mzorzLfQTuq73R0zx_DrAa0hThHDsghdZo=cxOWSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830065734.GA11944@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:57 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:20:20PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > Simplify by extending delete_git_dir() to handle the little bit of
> > extra functionality needed by prune_worktrees(), and drop the
> > effectively duplicate code from the latter.
>
> Makes sense. The name "delete_git_dir()" is a little funny (I assume it
> means "the git dir", not a worktree's git-dir), but that is not new (and
> it's static in worktree.c, which helps).
It's not necessarily the best name, but, as you say, it's not a new
issue, and it is local to that file.
Also, it's such a small function, and it's quite clear from the
implementation that it's deleting stuff from .git/worktrees that it's
probably okay to leave the name as-is for now.
> Your patch maybe stretches that a little by deleting non-directories.
> Maybe delete_from_worktrees() would be a better name. Probably not worth
> a re-roll, though.
That's perhaps a bit better, though still somewhat ambiguous, as I can
also read it as deleting something from every worktree directory, as
opposed to from .git/worktrees.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-28 21:20 [PATCH 0/9] worktree: fix bugs and broaden --force applicability Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 1/9] worktree: don't die() in library function find_worktree() Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/9] worktree: move delete_git_dir() earlier in file for upcoming new callers Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 3/9] worktree: generalize delete_git_dir() to reduce code duplication Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 6:57 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:45 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 4/9] worktree: prepare for more checks of whether path can become worktree Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/9] worktree: disallow adding same path multiple times Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 7:28 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:22 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] worktree: teach 'add' to respect --force for registered but missing path Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 7:36 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] worktree: teach 'move' to override lock when --force given twice Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 7:38 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 8/9] worktree: teach 'remove' " Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 7:40 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-28 21:20 ` [PATCH 9/9] worktree: delete .git/worktrees if empty after 'remove' Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] worktree: fix bugs and broaden --force applicability Jeff King
2018-08-30 8:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 9:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-30 19:46 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-30 23:49 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-08-31 0:54 ` Jeff King
2018-08-31 21:57 ` Ramsay Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPig+cR90mzorzLfQTuq73R0zx_DrAa0hThHDsghdZo=cxOWSw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).