From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Kaartic Sivaraam" <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] builtin/worktree: enhance worktree removal
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 01:02:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRuR2cE9RtdOfvgzGbPVLBEtb38v24Myh9rn4zKk525yA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy3mr6ocp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>> I had envisioned a simple 'goto remove_control_info' rather than extra
>> nesting or refactoring, but that's a minor point.
>
> Yes, use of goto is also a good way to avoid having to worry about
> the future evolution of the codeflow in this function.
>
> So perhaps
>
> if (the directory is no longer there)
> goto cleanup;
> if (the worktree does not validate)
> return -1;
> ... the original code to (carefully) remove the
> ... worktree itself
>
> cleanup:
>
> ... remove control info
> ... free resources held in variables
> ... return from the function
>
> is what we want?
Yes, that's what I had in mind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 15:09 [RFC PATCH] builtin/worktree: enhance worktree removal Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-21 21:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-22 2:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-22 3:14 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-22 3:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-22 3:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-22 4:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-22 17:51 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-27 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-28 3:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-28 3:48 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-28 4:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-28 6:02 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2017-11-28 16:46 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-22 17:13 ` [RFC PATCH] " Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-22 17:09 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2017-11-22 18:05 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cRuR2cE9RtdOfvgzGbPVLBEtb38v24Myh9rn4zKk525yA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).