From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FE4C4361B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC94B238E4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725987AbgLIBlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:41:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725791AbgLIBlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:41:44 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5857CC0613CF for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id d189so31057oig.11 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:41:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xDShpG5hcv65KzNrC10RnGhN7SIzghZXFbe+7pJGyUY=; b=naaInTWLKU8V906epocg711zQYSX3Gqov854xS8+40skURS7v21wx2OE7KRRAn/VGn rZsK5MkJZrWuY3qA6d+XdM9LyLcH0p/GRlc3KGAjAmw1LHiOxH6x/0Jnr1GFvUmAqUHk ZqAwqOBCLdJ8EhtrKtt6ceyz8FQxRbMMmAepwFqNEyJ5VdLdnUbTHnZRjnP7uYLMSfg+ TYYzJDJAbyqQLnnGcraTvycJzS2jsP9kr/0jaxG+AF+zkVoC3ew0LEO6pESn1IybSCir 96krLJMeEYYIufMhnQVzP4me+Gf8tr+uu6eiNfpgSJG+L0zQ3AYb/PdJi3cgYPEJehTP fkUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xDShpG5hcv65KzNrC10RnGhN7SIzghZXFbe+7pJGyUY=; b=SWjVvtGb2wCYRqBTOwWtb+plFVGQwlHQeqHANN2baZ11J7tSdZMAknRI9iODpRkcfy M9SlKVecs4/SDs2JXJ/2QnIWoP22NL5Gg+DwOTh/+OufakVUNyaa9IaheLOEwlM69umg /JXo/tiOfgcNtxsGy//VFnHnldKoquxgw+MYSMzIcbnZBshWtfdkmBH9tVpbumYe374o 3o8AGgz27mqfpF7rgeLyhiI/fTZXPyzmJYDKFcgCf802dnn7ujoMN56Fmeiax9Y+f75l 7wa1G19LXf1oz7ZzQ1qfOkYKd57OENWE5rAaGtr96iJ1y5tmH0cIS+iblQ2TtXIQZSZp cA2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530885hP7mHwbA4sFA6uwUBUppG/qwthzOULtZVNh5JJTWhrKKmK f3vi1+7Ee5Xpat9bF2KCBt/VAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKXxHmyBZhK66yHNAapnvWd6nSpUizGm0ERHkUxzOjb2Y9oprLKcpaLJAR+NM+x9NgfkFfiA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:fc96:: with SMTP id a144mr209264oii.146.1607478063744; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:41:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([8.44.146.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y204sm22367oiy.38.2020.12.08.17.41.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:41:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:41:00 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2020, #01; Tue, 8) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:31:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * tb/partial-clone-filters-fix (2020-12-03) 2 commits > - upload-pack.c: don't free allowed_filters util pointers > - builtin/clone.c: don't ignore transport_fetch_refs() errors > > Fix potential server side resource deallocation issues when > responding to a partial clone request. > > Will merge to 'next'. This is one that I'd like to see in -rc0, if possible. It's fixing a regression that has existed for two releases (both 2.28 and 2.29). On the other hand, I don't think that anybody has reported these issues... > * tb/pack-bitmap (2020-12-08) 24 commits > > Various improvement to the codepath that writes out pack bitmaps. > > Will merge to 'next'? I'm obviously biased, but I'd be quite happy to see this get onto next. I would like Jonathan Tan to take another look over the series (since he reviewed many parts of v2), in addition to anybody else with interest and time. Thanks, Taylor