From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Tan" <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 05:15:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHgEGHIgwfobcwDr@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414191403.4387-1-rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:14:01PM +0200, Rafael Silva wrote:
> It took me a bit to come up with the test because it seems `repack`
> doesn't offer an option to skip the "deletion of unpacked objects",
> so this series adds a new option to `repack` for skip the
> `git prune-packed` execution thus allowing us to easily inspect the
> unpacked objects before they are removed and simplification of our
> test suite. Furthermore, The test will now test the `repack` code
> path instead of performing the operations by calling
> `pack-objects`.
Thanks for working on this. Overall the patches seem sane, though I
think Jonathan's comments (especially about the confusion in the commit
message of 2/2) are worth addressing.
I have mixed feelings on the "--no-prune-packed" option, just because
it's user-visible and I don't think it's something a normal user would
ever really want.
In the new test (and I think in the old ones you modified, though I
didn't look carefully) the main thing we care about is whether we write
out loose objects. So another solution would be to improve the debug
logging inside pack-objects to tell us more about what it's doing.
The fork of Git we use at GitHub has something similar; when we discard
objects or force them loose, we write their sha1 values to a log file.
This has come in handy for a lot of after-the-fact debugging ("oops,
this repo is corrupted; did we intentionally delete object X?").
I wonder if we could do something similar with the trace2 facility. I
know it can be turned on via config, but I don't know how good the
support is for enabling just one segment of data (and this may generate
a lot of entries, so people using trace2 for telemetry probably wouldn't
want it on).
For the purposes of the tests, though just a normal GIT_TRACE_PACK_DEBUG
would be plenty. I dunno. I don't want to open up a can of worms on
logging that would hold up getting this quite-substantial fix in place.
But once we add --no-prune-packed, it will be hard to take away.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-03 9:04 rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-05 1:02 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-07 21:17 ` Jeff King
2021-04-08 0:02 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-08 0:35 ` Jeff King
2021-04-12 7:09 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-12 21:36 ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12 21:49 ` Bryan Turner
2021-04-12 23:51 ` Jeff King
2021-04-12 23:47 ` Jeff King
2021-04-13 7:12 ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs Jeff King
2021-04-13 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] is_promisor_object(): free tree buffer after parsing Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-14 5:18 ` Jeff King
2021-04-13 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] lookup_unknown_object(): take a repository argument Jeff King
2021-04-13 7:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] revision: avoid parsing with --exclude-promisor-objects Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-13 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14 17:14 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-14 19:22 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-13 18:05 ` rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14 5:14 ` Jeff King
2021-04-11 10:59 ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12 7:53 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 23:50 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-18 14:15 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] repack: avoid loosening promisor pack objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-15 1:04 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-15 3:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15 9:03 ` Jeff King
2021-04-15 9:05 ` Jeff King
2021-04-18 7:12 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-15 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-18 8:40 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 22:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15 9:15 ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-04-18 8:20 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] repack: avoid loosening promisor objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 19:15 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-21 18:54 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-21 19:25 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-21 19:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Rafael Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHgEGHIgwfobcwDr@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).