From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88F9C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 21:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76B76108D for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 21:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234543AbhIFV4W (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:56:22 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:57065 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231256AbhIFV4V (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:56:21 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590D813BEC0; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:55:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+3EIKql2R7RUT0KxGXe95kTEOlFkBvQcSjnYWt 8Nr4M=; b=ITqI8ldvpJPZapLiIhKUwokq9PmdHQJWNGGZYEaTB5csjMGURKzqUX Hj/SG+6mxu1ItQA1swJeN6sEqZSHQ2PkUWDegwIw3OTzm8C8bGRLa0gHR/yS0WvN s5VhugIH5iEEj8aP3287CKRz37d/qT4ORXgIIDbfSYmo5r/kHWv5g= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F57313BEBF; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:55:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.172.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7595813BEBE; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 17:55:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2021, #01; Thu, 2) References: Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:55:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 2021 12:36:41 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1C6D4B3A-0F5D-11EC-B862-98D80D944F46-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 12:48 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * hn/reftable (2021-08-26) 29 commits >> - SQUASH??? https://github.com/git/git/runs/3439941236?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:700 >> - reftable: fixup for new base topic 3/3 >> - reftable: fixup for new base topic 2/3 >> - reftable: fixup for new base topic 1/3 > .. >> The "reftable" backend for the refs API. > > I posted a subset of these patches as > https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1081.git.git.1630335476.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ Thanks for a ping. I saw it but haven't read it. > As discussed with AEvar, it will probably speed things up if we can > focus on getting the base library submitted without hooking it up to > Git. This would avoid cross-interactions with other pending topics, > and reduce the size of the more controversial topic (hooking it up to > Git). My worry is that a "base library" that is not hooked up to anything that works in the system would not be properly reviewed at all. Of course, without review, it would speed things up, but it is unclear if that the kind of speed we want. Anyway, I'll eject the old topic and replace them with the latest one soonish. Thanks.