From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, philipoakley@iee.email,
eschwartz@archlinux.org, "Carlo Arenas" <carenas@gmail.com>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Victoria Dye" <vdye@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] async_die_is_recursing: work around GCC v11.x issue on Fedora
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:46:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcznf3jbj.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29114bd7-1c81-7580-c8c0-88904dd013db@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:08:00 -0400")
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
> Having our CI go red because the 'latest' feed changed something is
> probably the best "feed" to subscribe to, since we only get notified
> if it matters.
>
> Better to have automation go red than for us to not realize our code
> doesn't work on newer platforms because our CI hasn't been updated.
I consider this a better implementation of what Æver suggested ;-)
And an incident like this is one of the reasons why I like the "CI
does not stop after seeing the first problem" behaviour. In a short
term, people can ignore a particular known failure and ensure they
do not introduce any new ones.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-04 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 1:47 [PATCH] async_die_is_recursing: fix use of pthread_getspecific for Fedora Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget
2021-11-04 2:23 ` Carlo Arenas
2021-11-04 2:37 ` Jeff King
2021-11-04 3:20 ` Carlo Arenas
2021-11-04 5:56 ` Jeff King
2021-11-04 4:01 ` [PATCH v2] async_die_is_recursing: work around GCC v11.x issue on Fedora Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget
2021-11-04 5:58 ` Jeff King
2021-11-04 6:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-04 9:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-04 13:08 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-11-04 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-11-05 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-04 8:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-11-04 9:46 ` Carlo Arenas
2021-11-04 16:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcznf3jbj.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=carenas@gmail.com \
--cc=eschwartz@archlinux.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.email \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).