From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A8F1F4C0 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730676AbfJ2C13 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:27:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:53354 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728497AbfJ2C13 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:27:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451902D508; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:27:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=RYRoiSa8Y9Czz546GLQjy19CaZY=; b=aN7Qlb eV+GDoQoXOtHb1MAusSSWs9LIDMdBdgY65CVKFrcKpz302YY2dM1lIhHHyDL9xTo KKV6kckL1ilaD1bZbuWhJ6rgXp6rbdf9eJ2dO7yOYKJCZdQcY0JObbPgwBFGQyHb jOFiGI62pq8fCYfFs6fz+6f1AFaPaBnNF344k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MwNLkFh2bYYrZ3Us3LNQyxPUR9toIsFG oFfqVJ42H3BmuSBtwbw1zD5Uf8IA/IOOtfMWO2PCGs5iOhDD33X/AihZvNyPaA+T /3YvbY5eb24UYMsByLnO4Q52v/enGU+bo7MqfVjh2TAJKxpWJBxpZd/ngmJel/7V +Nv+6qBRejc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFB02D507; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:27:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D9C52D503; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:27:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone References: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:27:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:07:15 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A5C91886-F9F3-11E9-8309-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Isn't this something reasonably easy to guard against regression with >> a test or two? > > I sent out a v2 with tests added to 1/2. Good; that way, not just "stash" but anything that relies on update-index would be protected from regressions. Thanks.