historical-speck.lore.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: speck@linutronix.de
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 1/2] more sampling fun 1
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:53:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220175340.GD58564@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220100745.GA30404@zn.tnic>

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:07:45AM +0100, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:11:02PM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote:
> > From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add capability to specify a range of steppings in the
> > 
> > Intel has produced processors with the same CPUID family+model. Code
> > may need to check the stepping when programming model specific behavior.
> > 
> > Add an API to allow easy specification of stepping or range of steppings
> > with a 16 bit bitmask.
> > 
> > Update cpu_vuln_whitelist using this new API.
> > 
> > I implemented this in the way I did to avoid modifying x86_cpu_id as
> > that structure is an exported ABI and any change would impact user mode
> > code using the structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: tony luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c         | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> Why isn't this sent to lkml like a normal patch?
Because its only needed in the context of the WIP mitigation patch that I'm
having issues sending propperly.

Sigh, I guess I'll just put it in a reply.

--mark

> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
> -- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-20 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 10:07 [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 1/2] more sampling fun 1 Borislav Petkov
2020-02-20 10:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-20 10:13   ` [MODERATED] " Borislav Petkov
2020-02-20 11:00     ` [MODERATED] " Andrew Cooper
2020-02-20 12:39       ` Greg KH
2020-02-20 17:53 ` mark gross [this message]
2020-02-20 18:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-02-20 19:24     ` mark gross
2020-02-21 22:12     ` mark gross
     [not found] <c79feecdb14c62e3dd8f2680bc68292f99882aeb.158215=?utf-8?q?2322?= .git.mgross@linux.intel.com>
2020-02-20 19:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2020-02-21 22:10   ` mark gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200220175340.GD58564@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com \
    --to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=speck@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).