From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 29 Oct 2019 15:36:04 -0000 Received: from [91.217.168.176] (helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iPTXP-00021Q-Iy for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:36:03 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:35:56 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] NX 0 In-Reply-To: <20191029123157.GG838@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <1571902455-22638-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20191028160203.GB838@suse.de> <20191029093900.GF838@suse.de> <20191029123157.GG838@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, speck for Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:00:10PM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Not a conflict, but 3/5 needs an extra delta patch on top AFAICT. Paolo said he > > would send a v8. I'll have a look later today. > > Ah okay, Paolo wanted to include the fix for the !npt/!ept cases (where > efer.nx was clear for the guest at early boot so that the nx-pages > caused rsvd-bit faults). > > But he sent the fix separatly to the public already here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191027152323.24326-1-pbonzini@redhat.com/ > > I guess he plans to send it upstream before the CRD date, Paolo? So the fix is independent of the NX pile, right? But OTOH, for testing the NX stuff with all the various knobs and options the patch is needed I assume. Thanks, tglx