From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>,
"Vudum, Lakshminarayana" <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:03:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159039381690.30979.6896983521245965877@build.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d391e915b930423ea02677a0b0afed3e@intel.com>
Quoting Lisovskiy, Stanislav (2020-05-25 09:00:33)
> I have seen those failures in other patches as well, i.e before my patches landed.
Look again. CI is very clear, as is the bisect and revert.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 13:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 1/7] drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to separate function Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/i915: Check plane configuration properly Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-20 14:58 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 4/7] drm/i915: Plane configuration affects CDCLK in Gen11+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-20 14:59 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 5/7] drm/i915: Introduce for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask macro Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 21:25 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 23:55 ` Manasi Navare
2020-05-20 15:00 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/i915: Remove unneeded hack now for CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev14) Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15) Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-05-20 6:22 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-20 8:43 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-05-20 8:44 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-20 8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18) Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-20 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15) Patchwork
2020-05-21 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18) Patchwork
2020-05-21 9:35 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-21 21:02 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-05-22 22:00 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-22 23:18 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-25 8:00 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-25 8:03 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-05-25 8:07 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-25 8:09 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-25 8:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-21 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-21 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Manasi Navare
2020-05-21 22:17 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159039381690.30979.6896983521245965877@build.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).