From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
To: "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 08:02:46 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <162737296658.18665.2787155874930613964@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5701 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93056/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10399 -> Patchwork_20713
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20713 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind:
- fi-bwr-2160: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([i915#3194])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10399/fi-bwr-2160/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-bwr-2160/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
- fi-tgl-u2: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#1888])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10399/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
- fi-pnv-d510: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271]) +48 similar issues
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-pnv-d510/igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bdw-5557u: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#1602] / [i915#2029])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@runner@aborted.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr:
- fi-pnv-d510: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#299]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10399/fi-pnv-d510/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-pnv-d510/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms@a-dsi1:
- {fi-tgl-dsi}: [DMESG-WARN][9] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10399/fi-tgl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms@a-dsi1.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/fi-tgl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms@a-dsi1.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[i915#1602]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1602
[i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888
[i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982
[i915#2029]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2029
[i915#299]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/299
[i915#3194]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3194
Participating hosts (39 -> 35)
------------------------------
Missing (4): fi-ilk-m540 fi-bsw-cyan fi-bdw-samus fi-hsw-4200u
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_10399 -> Patchwork_20713
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_10399: 669037414c99bf454019d7e2497fe29995e31e61 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_6151: c3170c2d3744521b8351a4b9c579792bc9a5f835 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_20713: f12c2ebdf907dd009bc6310516ca98e3ba14c8d8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
f12c2ebdf907 drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER
78303adaa154 drm/i915: replace random CNL comments
3a0814c0a9f4 drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers
0916dd775911 drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10
544b72f54be6 drm/i915: finish removal of CNL
e65974c74595 drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h
765c88769c02 drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c
98f26f380fc4 drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c
87f4dc291f49 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c
708e28316b93 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c
4541a36b1fa9 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c
58364762cb69 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c
68fcd2f1f506 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c
506c792c86b3 drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c
8df58456158c drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables
222000469bb1 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c
4f34aa14a702 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c
98fa787acbd9 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c
6e7cf4e004f5 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c
dc12f36ad994 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c
e8d98b29fd9d drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c
ce0001293c11 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c
40cbd5fc3c1d drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c
015b23d3e34e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c
16b255a7143e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c
6011233fbc7e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c
2237799b400a drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c
84aa6c05f713 drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20713/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6618 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 7:18 [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/28] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/28] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 19/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 20/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 21/28] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 23/28] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 24/28] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 25/28] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 26/28] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 27/28] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 28/28] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2.1] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Patchwork
2021-07-27 7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-27 8:02 ` Patchwork [this message]
2021-07-27 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-27 17:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-27 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-27 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-28 3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=162737296658.18665.2787155874930613964@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).